Monday, April 5, 2010

Stop oppressive forms of recruitment! Scrap the unjust UPI teacher contracts!

The newly formed organization of Filipino teachers, the Filipino Educators Federation of Louisiana, sent us the statement below in time for today's hearing of the case filed against UPI with the Louisiana Workforce Commission.


Filipino Educators Federation of Louisiana
Press Statement
April 5, 2010

Stop oppressive forms of recruitment!
Scrap the unjust UPI teacher contracts!

We, members of the Filipino Educators Federation of Louisiana, call for the immediate end to the oppressive recruitment practices of Universal Placement International (UPI) and the scrapping of the unjust contract that were forced on the teachers. We are victims of these practices and have banded together as an organization to assert our rights and advocate for the protection of the rights of migrant teachers and workers as a whole.

We join all the Filipino teachers who share our aspiration for justice. We fully support the efforts of our fellow educators under the banner of the American Federation of Teachers and the Louisiana Federation of Teachers. We are not doing this only for ourselves and our families but also to the hundreds more who stand to be victimized if these excessively unjust practices are not stopped.

Our members will be testifying in today’s hearing to put on record the oppression we have experienced and the onerous contracts that were forced on the Filipino teachers under the threat of being “deported” or deprived of a job. We have experienced different forms of intimidation and manipulation that was aimed solely to strengthen the grip of tyranny of Lulu Navarro over all of us.

Filipino teachers have suffered from excessive and illegal fees and up to now our families are burdened with heavy debts back home. We have endured verbal threats and legal bullying to make us submit to the whims of the placement agency.

Indeed Lourdes “Lulu” Navarro, the owner of UPI, is not new to such criminal behavior as she is a convicted felon in the State of California on several counts of Medi-Cal fraud, grand theft, money laundering and identity theft.

We call on the Louisiana Workforce Commission to give relief to the migrant Filipino teachers deployed in the different school districts in Louisiana who have showed dedication to their vocation and commitment to quality education. We call on the commission to stand with the foreign teachers who have showed perseverance to make a difference in the lives of the children of Louisiana despite their horrible circumstances.

We appeal on the honorable commission to nullify the lopsided contract that is being utilized by Universal Placement International as a tool to oppress these migrant teachers. We appeal on the commission to stand by Louisiana’s public policy and tell the world that these inhumane practices have no place in the State; that no legal technicality can provide a smokescreen for repression.

We also enjoin all other Filipino teachers who share these experiences to come out and stand up for your rights. Let us broaden our unities against this injustice and together pursue our dreams for our families with dignity.

We call on all workers and parents here in Louisiana to support our cause for justice as this is not simply an issue about recruitment but an issue that concerns a grossly immoral and deceitful practice aimed at enriching a person at the expense of others. This issue is imbued with public interest as it concerns the education of our children.

Today, as we struggle for justice, we renew our commitment to serve the needs of the different school districts in the State of Louisiana. We enjoin the public in our aspiration to end all oppressive forms of recruitment. Join us in our call to put a stop to the illegal operations of Universal Placement International and the nullity of these burdensome teachers’ contracts.

201 comments:

  1. O Lulu, bakit ka nagtatago? Wala ka bang mukha na ihaharap sa mga niloko mo?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bakit mo naman naproduce yong mga contracts na may dates na April at May Lulu. Paano mo nagawa yun??? Nagsign lang kami nung paalis na kami. Paano mo na produce yun? Ganyan pala kadali sa iyo ang magfalsify ng documents?

    ReplyDelete
  3. To Ms. Rafaela Flores...ang lakas naman ng loob mo na sabihin na hinahatinggabi sa bahay ng american male ang ibang mga guro....may proof ka ba? ikaw ano sa palagay mo kaibahan mo...na kapwa pinoy mo ang nakaanak sayo...!at least sila hinahatinggabi lang......!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Waaah! What is the difference between an educators' recruiter and an employment agency?
    Lulu is trying to get around the La Code.

    ReplyDelete
  5. did ya'll noticed the similarity of Jack Navarro and Renante Depol? Mgkamukha sila, pareho din silang syunga! Di kaya twins sila?!

    ReplyDelete
  6. di ba may pagka racist si rafaela kasi ini-identify nya yung american male? ipokrita sya, eh sya nga homewrecker. paano sya pakakasalan ni arvin eh may asawa yun sa pinas? kapal ng mukha nyang akala mo kung sinong nagmamalinis....

    ReplyDelete
  7. another case for her (Lulu Navarro) falsification..remember all of us had a copy of the contract and there was a date on that when we signed it..... even she changed it hundred times wala na siyang magagawa pa...ginawa nya lang tanga ang asawa nya....pa ba? ( di ba sabi nya divorce na sila)bagay nga silang mag friend ni rafaela flores,, birds with the same feather flocks together...parehas na nagmamalinis...! Ganin din pala...!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Akala ko kaya lumalaban ang ibang teachers dahil gusto nila ng justice.Injustice at unfair ang ginagawa nyo sa ibang taong binabanggit nyo sa blog na ito samantalang wala naman silang ginagawang masama sa inyo.Kung galit kayo sa isang tao try nyo pa ring magpakadisente sa mga pananalita ninyo.Nakakahiya kayo. Teacher pa man din kayong naturingan.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Filipino Educators Federation of Louisiana?Ano yan?Yan ba ang federation ng mga teachers na nagpopost sa blog na ito?Akala ko pa naman nabuo ang blog na ito para may site to air your grievances.Kaya lang disgusting naman ang karamihan sa mga nababasa.Below the belt na ang sinasabi nyo sa mga co-teachers ninyong wala namang ginagawang masama sa inyo.Akala ko ba kay Lulu kayo galit dahil sa contract?Bakit pati buhay-buhay ng mga teachers eh nadadamay sa blog na ito?Pati yang isyung hindi pa kasal ang isang teacher eh nadadamay?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tama si Anonymous April 6, 2010 3:37 P.M.we need to prove that we are worthy of our cause.We can not fight injustice with injustice.We have been despised so we should never despise anybody.We should not treat anybody with contempt on suspicion that he/she is connected to Lulu.Who knows our suspicion might not be true.For all you know he might be suffering the same fate as yours.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah! naaawa ako sa kaibigan kong dating nagkacarpool.Noong kailangan ang tulong nya nandyan lang sya walang hinihindian.Ngayon pati sya idinadamay sa blog na ito dahil lang pinagsususpetsahang kasabwat ni Lulu.Baka hindi nyo alam pati sya eh tinatakot din pero hindi lang sya nagsasabi sa inyo.Baka hindi nyo alam pati sya eh nakakatanggap din ng demand letter.Baka hindi nyo alam pati sya eh hinaharass din ng mga taga-UPI.Anong kasalanan ba ang nagawa ng kaibigan ko sa inyo ha?Nagagalit kayo sa kanya because of mere suspicion?Anong bait meron kayo sa sarili nyo at you are acting based on suspicion?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sino ba kaibigan mo?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Please lang po, huwag kayong mag-aaway-away, iisa ang hangarin natin: "Na mangibabaw ang Katotohanan", iwasan nating manghusga, mayroong batas: Batas ng Tao at Batas ng Diyos, ang gawain natin sa ngayon: "pray for the fair judgment" we will wait for two weeks... Makakamtan natin ang tagumpay kung tayong lahat, ay magiging mahinahon.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Si Ela and si Depol ang kaibigan ko bakit?may porsyento kasi ako sa pagtawag ko ng magpapacarpool sa kanila.$15-20 yata!I'M NOT A LIAR!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. May batas ba sa amerika against carpooling?may batas ba against sa pagbibigay ng porsyento granting hindi ka nga liar?pero malamang liar ka eh.may ebidensya ka ba to prove your allegation?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yan ang mahirap sa ibang pilipino eh.pupuntahan ka sa tirahan mo, hihingi ng tulong, magpapahatid sa kung saan-saan maski anong oras, ihahatid mo tapos susunduin sa gustong oras tapos pag nakabili na ng sasakyan eh masama na ang tingin sa iyo.how i wish pinabayaan na lang maglakad yan o kaya magtaxi para naubos sa pagtataxi ang pera.babayaran ka lang ng ilang dolyar samantalang pagod ka na, inilagay mo sa posibleng aksidente ang buhay mo,nagbayad ng mahal sa insurance para maprotektahan ang sakay, laspag pa ang sasakyan mo.konting amount lang na siningil mo kapalit ng pagpapakapagod mo eh aapihin ka na.kawawa ang mga dating nagkacarpool na ngayon eh inaapi kasi hindi na kailangan ang serbisyo nila dahil ang mga teachers eh payabangan na at papormahan ng mga bagong biling sasakyan.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous of April 6, 2010(5:30PM)- pamilyar ang mga santimyento na ito ah..DEPOL!!!ganyang ganyan ang sentimyento ni depol.di paghingi ng tulong yun kasi ang tulong walang bayad.masmasarap pa nga maglakad at magtaxi kasi walang utang na loob di tulad pagnagpacarpool may utang na loob ka!eto lang yan di sana kung ayaw mo at pagod ka na humindi ka pero iba kasi pagpera na usapan.
    Hindi sa nangaapi sila sabihin mo naiinggit ka kasi may bago silang sasakyan at wala ka ng icacarpool!

    ReplyDelete
  18. April 6? C'mon nah! Cliche says "little knowledge is dangerous." are u sure that u know wats going on? or u are just trying to be dumb? U can't control the feelings of the victims right now. don't do that. That's ridiculous. First if you are part of us, u must have been so irresponsible of not knowing wat's going on. Were you in that event when she sounded scholarly in discussing the process and the rationale of Lulu getting a passport from us right after arrival? How can u tell me that she is not part of all these? No single teacher here, am sure, knows why we have to do all that except that lady. How can u tell me that she is not part of all these when she does some stuff (unsolicited) for Lulu as wat she unveiled in that event too? Now if you didn't hear all these during that event, you must have been keen and critical enough to listen; if you didn't know all these, you must have researched first before reacting; if you don't understand what i am talking about, you must have been a quiet follower for this issue instead of trying to sound as if you knew a lot. I challenge u... give me a plethora of information that could prove that she is not for Lulu for I will give u a diary of our predicaments here. Now, this is addressed to that lady: You are a liar. I am sorry. When you told people that Lulu doesn't intimidate and yell at us, you lied and you know that.

    ReplyDelete
  19. pls. don't include depol here. he is a good fellow. i think he must have been so critical this time. at least he keeps himself quiet. If he did something wrong, I believe his silence on this issue shows that he is remorseful.

    ReplyDelete
  20. you're right! kaya nga nagkacarpool kasi may bayad at kaya ka sumakay kasi alam mong nakakatipid ka.pareho lang na nabenefit ang both parties.eh bakit ngayon maraming umaapi sa kanya?ano ba ang nagawa nyang kasalanan sa inyo?bakit maiinggit si dipol sa may bagong kotse?di ba nya kayang bumili ng car?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Are you sure that he's a good fellow?!!he's being quiet doesn't mean he's remorseful.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Rafaela Flores = BIG LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well if he is not remorseful at least d'paul didn't show his being ignoramus. He didn't come out to the open and declared himself as NOT A LIAR. Let's see it that way.

    ReplyDelete
  24. why some of the teachers feast more on the issues which are not vital to the genuine lines and calls of this cause?

    it is so saddening to realize that some of the teachers dont have at least the value and principles of not just as teachers but as true blooded filipinos. it throws my stomach up when some teachers chose blind obedience to the lopsided contract than grope to get out of the unjust stipulations it impose on the teachers. it is most disheartening that some teachers are either intellectual arrogants or too insecured with those teachers who are principled and courageous enough to stand and fight irregardless of the threats and possible consequences this move might cause them.

    it is not surprising too that some teachers are too practical to the point of them selling dignity and principle or with close eyes and bitten lips accept whatever the contract and lulu drops on teachers laps. this is a choice, and not a principle but we respect you for that by letting you do your criticisms on us.

    but whatever differences on principles or even strategies teachers have and take, the common denominator is that everyone had a taste of upi and pars wrath. isn't that enough reason for the teachers to aspire the same goal of regaining dampen dignity? it is not easy to be a victim but it is much harder and degrading to be a victim forever.

    set aside differences! may i remind everyone that this should not divide the teachers in whatever way.

    lastly, may i have this opportunity to thank those group and individual teachers who continue to criticize what our group is doing. your comments are valued and taken into consideration in all the moves our group is taking. you give us more challenges on top of what lulu is giving us. thanks!

    it is better to be regarded as stupid and go back to the philippines with head held high for fighting what is right, than to stay here with pocketfull of dollars but conscience overflowing with guilt (if you have one or if you can stomach that in). that is both a choice and principle.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Ang problema kasi kay Ella, NAPAKA PAKIALAMERA nya! buhay ng buhay pinakikialaman. Sa totoo lang Lulu, si Ella ang ngpahamak syo! Kung naging propesyonal sya at di tsismosa, kumikita ka pa din sana ngayon sa 2nd year 10% placement fee namen.

    Sobra kasi kung pumapel! EPAL! Kahit anu gagawin nya para lang maging sikat! Well, you truly are infamous now Ella! tsk tsk tsk, kakaawa hitsura mo during the event. Not a single teacher greeted you, then you still tried to get attention by telling the judge that you are being threatened, ang cheap mo! Pero ok lang sikat ka nman! pwe!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Mayee! Idol ka namen! Salamat sa lahat ng paghihirap mo!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hey to the one who said epal. that is just ur opinion. that doesn't sound intelligent though. it was not ella who is responsible for all of these. even without ella, Lulu wouldn't really get the 10% for the second year for the contract itself and their interpretation are deceitful. You are completely wrong wen u said that ella is the reason why we are doing this-- well if that's ur reason, be it urs. ours is based on intellectual understanding of the contract. What u did was a display of ignorance. Let's be objective here. don't do that. c'mon nah!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Fighting for principle is good so long as it is an "enlightened" and "guided" principle. Sometimes courage is worth emulating if it is coupled with intelligent tactics and strategy.The reason why some people do not join your struggle is because they do not see that it will prosper legally.Do not accuse them of not having principles. They have principles, they know how to fight but they know when is the right time to fight - when they are armed with evidence legally acceptable in any court of law.The problem with you is you sensationalize your case.You make it appear as though it is correct to fight everytime you are abused.It is correct to fight when you are armed with the right weapons.Media exposure, emotional outbursts in blogsites are not enough weapons.Do not criticize others for not participating in your struggle. They are not without principle. They are thinking.They make sure that when they attack, they attack with fury and they attack with a winning case. Nakakahiya kasing mapahiya sa court at sabihing nahihilo ka kaya hindi alam ang pinipirmahan mo.That's displayed stupidity!Nakakahiyang pumunta sa court na hearsay evidence lang ang hawak.

    ReplyDelete
  29. not only to mayee, but also to the ones who took some responsibilities to do some office work for teachers who are "dawat limpyo" even if they are not really obliged to. they wasted time and effort to do all these. they are just outstanding advocates. hats off to you'll.

    ReplyDelete
  30. that's a lame and ridiculous excuse that has been a claim of a clueless mamal. got a question for you amigo... did you see the ovelwhelming evidences studied for a year, and presented before the adjudicators? or you didn't even know if they were evidences. you are displaying your stupidity. Don't make excuses. am done with them. now, ask yourself if you really will come out with a case. if you sue lulu, even if you don't win, tell me and ammana salute you for being brave. but this time, i know u are just making blatant lame excuses to cover up ur cowardice. i pity you.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous said...
    that's a lame and ridiculous excuse that has been a claim of a clueless mamal. got a question for you amigo... did you see the ovelwhelming evidences studied for a year, and presented before the adjudicators? or you didn't even know if they were evidences. you are displaying your stupidity. Don't make excuses. am done with them. now, ask yourself if you really will come out with a case. if you sue lulu, even if you don't win, tell me and ammana...

    >>>> blah blah blah! I don't get your point! by the way, it's spelled mammal!

    ReplyDelete
  32. thanks. u are quite queer. ur comprehension is poor but u spot the misspelled simple world. would u like to correct my "ammana" word? now my point is, don't make excuses. go ahead. it's been two years since this has started. am pretty sure you've had ur 'strong' evidences gathered already. am pretty certain that you've planned things out with your lawyers already. go ahead. do ur legal feat now. wen will u go out, after 10 years? don't make excuses! give me a break. is this clearer now?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Someone said, it is a shame for a Filipino to do it to his own fellowmen. But even in front of the teachers, Jack Navarro claimed his country is America and his government is the American Government. That was more shameful! Jack and his wife Lulu have lost the respect they could have gotten from the US and from the Philippines. And yes, Jack and Lulu maybe citizens of America, but it does not give them more power to do these injustices to the teachers. In my own opinion, both Filipinos and Americans do not agree with what PARS and UPI did. I admire the courage and the unity that these teachers have. Teachers, fight for your right!!!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Pieces of evidence po, hindi po evidences.

    ReplyDelete
  35. maraming SALAMAT sa mga nag attend sa hearing lalo na yung mga witnesses. higit sa lahat hwag din natin kalimutan ang mga teachers na walang sawang tumulong sa paghahanda sa hearing.

    ReplyDelete
  36. nakakatawa si JACK NAVARRO. Parang clown. Sabi nya " I can be a director today then a janitor tomorrow. I can even paint the wall."

    Dba hiwalay na kayo ni LULU JACK?
    Bilib ako sau. True Love talaga....

    TRUE LOVE FOR MONEY

    ReplyDelete
  37. who else testified and made sense?

    ReplyDelete
  38. http://abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/04/07/10/fg-arroyos-name-dragged-louisiana-teachers-suit

    ReplyDelete
  39. si jave at janet pala ang ipinagmamalaki ng federation?!ano maayos bang sumagot si jave na puro kayabangan lang ang nasa utak.akala ko mahina lang ang utak nun at grammar lang ang alam.moron pala!di pala marunong sumagot yan kung lawyer ang manggigisa sa kanya.eh di napahiya ang mga filipino teachers na lumalaban kay lulu?sabihin mong hindi mo nabasa ang contract dahil gutom ka - kundi ka ba naman tanga!bading kasi kaya puro daldal lang.

    ReplyDelete
  40. ang tapang namang magtestify sa court ng janet na yan.hindi ba nya alam na matatalino ang mga lawyers at hindi nadadala sa looks without brains?ipasa mo nga muna ang exam mo sa DMV para makakuha ka na ng driver's license at ang praxis mo para makakuha ka ng teaching certificate.pinaasa nyo lang ang ibang teachers na kumampi sa inyo sa pag-aakalang marunong kayong sumagot sa mga lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  41. to anonymous APRIL 7, 2010 7:11am

    Siguro ang tanging exam na napasa mo ay ang sa DMV lang. kawawa ka naman. pero at least may napasa ka diba? baka maka level 3 kana sa certificate mo dahil sa pagpasa mo sa DMV exam.

    ReplyDelete
  42. wat about you? have u passed the exams? wat type of exams have you passed? the easiest of them all? hey! you probably don't know the meaning of "testimony." You probably don't know the meaning of "telling the truth to the best of their abilities." why, when you tell the truth, do you need to have 135 IQ? Umayos nga kayo. The federation presented group of witnesses, not liars (or lawyers who need to be intelligent). I think what you did is another display of ignorance. porke ba may ph.d. or masters ka sa college of kampotpot, yabang mo na. bakit ba, wat are ur accomplishments being a teacher here in the united states? sabihin mo nga? an arrogant idiot!

    ReplyDelete
  43. you are correct. pieces of evidence. now, is that the only thing you can do? trying to be a grammarian in the realm of people who don't even care about grammar. wat about ur case then. tell me.

    ReplyDelete
  44. To April 7, 2010 9:09AM. You said I dont know the meaning of telling the truth to the best of abilities. Baka ikaw ang hindi nakakaintindi nyan.Sa korte ang pinaglalabanan eh strength ng facts and evidence.Anong ebidensya ba ang sinabi ng mga witnesses na yan?Yung mga affidavits ba ang ipinagyayabang ninyong ebidensya?Ebidensya bang matatawag yan?Hearsay evidence lang yan if not backed by physical or documentary evidence at hindi napanindigan sa korte once na ni-rebuttal ng lawyer.Besides, ano ba ang nakalagay sa affidavit na yan at ano ba ang testimony ng jave na yan?Nagugutom kaya hindi binasa ang contract?Bobo!Yung pinakmadaling exam nga lang ang napasa ko - high school PLT.nagtataka nga ako kasi pinakamadali na yon pero hindi maipasa-pasa ng karamihang kumuha.buti nga inabolish ng department of education yun kundi dagdag pasanin pa ng mga teachers na gaya ni jave na wala pang naipapasa maski isang exam.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Pag nagtestify ka sa court kailangan may konting sense naman ang sinasabi mo para mapaniwala mo ang judge.Besides, you testify to the truthfulness of the facts not to the truthfulness of your feelings or emotions.Kailangan pa bang ibida na reading specialist ka at napataas mo ang score ng students mo?Kailangan pa bang ibida na pinsuspende mo ang principal mo?Irrelevant to the issue at hand.Puro kayabangan kasi ang alam ng jave na yan.Napatunayan ba nyang may threat or intimidation which will warrant the nullification of the contract?I don't think so!Yan kasi puro kayabangan lang ang alam.Ipinahamak nya ang maraming teachers dahil sa sobrang kayabangan nya.Sana nga hindi na lang ako nag-attend sa hearing nayan.Nakakahiya!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Kayong mga tumutuligsa sa mga nagwitness if you think that you are more intelligent and more knowledgable than those who stand for what they think is right sana kayo nalang umupo duon at nagsalita...magagaling at matatalino pala kayo e!
    Wala naman namilit sayo na pumunta ka sa hearing for sure it's your choice para in the end makumpara mo sarili mo sa taong may painindigan dahil I know for sure ikaw walang bait sa sarili at hindi kaya tumayo sa katotohanan!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Ang sabihin mo gusto ring maging sikat kaya tumayo sa witness stand.Manindigan ka kung may laban ka.Kung walang laban ang kaso mo tumahimik ka na lang muna at maghintay ng tamang panahon.Pansamantala hayaang maghari ang kasakiman hanggang makakuha ng mas mabigat na ebidensya.Kahit pa sabihin mong one year kang nangalap ng ebidensya kung hindi naman malakas ang mga ebidensya eh mas mabuting tumahimik muna.Hindi naman pwedeng ipagmalaking ebidensya ang affidavit lalo kung kagaya ni jave at janet lang ang ico-cross-examine ng lawyers.Ako, tatlong kriminal na ang napakulong ko sa pinas (frustrated murder, im telling the truth).Kaya kong manindigan kung may laban.Kung walang laban, tumahimk muna at hayaang malulong sa pera at kapangyarihan hanggang dumami ang illegal at irregular na gawain nya to the point na hindi na nya kayang lusutan.Kaya pa kasi nyang lusutan ang sitwasyon eh binabanatan nyo na.Buti na lang pinaalalahanan yang jave na yan kundi perjury ang kaso nyan dahil sa pagiging denial queen.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anong sabi ni jave at janet?Hindi daw nila sigurado kung signature nila yung nasa contract?Hindi naman sa ganoong paraan mo mapapatunayang null and void ang contract eh.Akala ko ba they were forced and intimidated.Sana tinulungan sila ng mga lawyers kung paano patunayang may force at intimidation nga talaga.Palibhasa kasi yung ibang teachers na nagpopost sa blogsite na ito eh masyadong judgmental.May mga taong gustong tumulong pero nagsecond thought na lang kasi ayaw mapagbintangan ng kung anu-ano.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Si Ella ay mamahalin pala.... este kamukha ni MAHAL. Si Arvin naman ay pinaghalong bintong at empoy

    ReplyDelete
  50. to April 7, 2010 1:43PM. Ganun pala mga mukha nila.Ikaw naman sinong kamukha mo?Pinaghalong Andrew E at Melay?Nagcocomment ka pa sa blogsite na ito wala namang kwenta mga sinsabi mo.Nonsense ka rin gaya ni jave!Oh baka bading ka rin gaya nya?Babaeng bakla!hahaha.denial queen na pwedeng sampahan ng perjury!sabagay,sex or gender nga nya hindi nya madetermine, signature pa kaya.bwahahahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  51. at least si andrew E nagra-rap at si melay PBB winner.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Stop oppressive forms of recruitment!
    Scrap the unjust UPI teacher contracts!


    purely rhetorical! appeal to emotion and not to reason.hindi naman nagtranslate yang sinasabi nyo during the hearing.oppressive nga ang contract pero contract pa rin yan pag pinirmahan.ano, napatunayan nyo bang may force, threat at intimidation?ipinasubo nyo lang ang teachers na wag magbayad ng 10%.Lumaki na ang sinisingil sa akin dahil sa interest ah.May magagawa ba kayo ngayon?Kayo kaya ang pagbayarin ko sa interest na yan!Masyado kasi kayong nagmamagaling!Pa-media-media pa kayo!

    ReplyDelete
  53. napaka bobo mo naman. alam mo ba ang term na "illegal contract"? illegal kasi hindi approved ng workforce commission. ang mga nagbayad ng 10 percent ang walang utak. hindi alam kung anu ang nakasaad sa batas.

    kaya nga hindi nagpakita si LULU kasi alam nya na wala siyang laban. ang pinadala lang ay si clown JACK, mahal, bintong at tiya pusit.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Akala ko pangit si Ella sa personal. Hindi pala siya pangit. NAKAKADIRI LANG.

    I'm not a LIAR ha.

    ReplyDelete
  55. mas bobo ka pala eh.kelangan pa bang i-approve ng workforce commission yun eh contract of agency lang naman yun.ang kailangan lang dun eh ma-notarize at nung pinirmahan ng dalawang parties eh walang vitiation of will!tanga! kaya ka pala madaling ma-sway ng rhetorics eh.hindi ka nag-iisip!

    ReplyDelete
  56. Bilib din ako sa iyo ella flores, ang tapang mo!!!!! Ang tapang mong MAGSINUNGALING! Magaling ka talagang mag imbento ng stories. Sana lang magiging maayos ang paglaki ng anak mo.... hindi sya ang magdusa sa mga kasalanan mo...Kung ngayon feeling mong nasa taas ka, darating din talaga ang panahon na kailangan mong magpakumbaba at umamin sa mga kasalanan mo at ni lulu. Kung magsinungaling ka lang naman isipin mo naman yung realistic, hindi yung reason about sa minutes ng phone.....ano ba yan....ikaw lang bang maka afford ng unlimited calls and text.....HINDI Ha.....Marami kami.... pinababa mo lang lalo ang pagtingin sa iyo ng tao......

    ReplyDelete
  57. kung nakakadiri si ella, ikaw,ano ka?mas pangit nga ang ugali mo kasi tinitira mo ang tao sa blogsite.bakit hindi mo sabihin yan sa harap nya.takot ka ano?bakit hindi mo pangalanan ang sarili mo?takot ka?backstabber ka pala eh!MAS LALONG NAKAKADIRI KA!!!

    ReplyDelete
  58. bakit kailangang idamay ang anak?hindi mo ba nare-realize na nagcu-curse ka na?hindi ka ba natatakot na baka mapunta sa iyo ang mga binibitawan mong curse?wag mong idamay ang batang walang kinalaman dahil langit ang poprotekta sa kanila.

    ReplyDelete
  59. basta si ELLA ay nakakadiri talaga. ang mga sinusuka ni LULU ay kinakain nya.

    ReplyDelete
  60. "Lumaki na ang sinisingil sa akin dahil sa interest ah.May magagawa ba kayo ngayon?Kayo kaya ang pagbayarin ko sa interest na yan!Masyado kasi kayong nagmamagaling!Pa-media-media pa kayo!"

    >>>mgpakilala ka at babayaran kita! halata namang mukha kang pera tulad ni Ella. Di na ako magugulat kung malaman kong bayaran ka ni Lulu!

    ReplyDelete
  61. Rafaela Flores dami mo fans dito sa blog.iba na talaga kapag sinungaling kaya lang sana pinagbutihan mo pa kasi hindi ka pumasa kahit best supporting actress lang!I pity you so much!you made alot of phone calls to alot of teachers para pagsabihan at sigawan..ang laki mong sinungaling!ikaw nga lang nakakaalam saan pwede macontact ang mga tagaUPI na sasagutin tawag mo.
    meron ka pa nalalaman na "as a normal person lulu is not mean and vindictive"..dito palang liar ka na kasi hindi naman NORMAL PERSON si lulu.bagay kayo magsama wala na sa katinuan ang mga pagiisip!!

    ReplyDelete
  62. "Lumaki na ang sinisingil sa akin dahil sa interest ah.May magagawa ba kayo ngayon?Kayo kaya ang pagbayarin ko sa interest na yan!Masyado kasi kayong nagmamagaling!Pa-media-media pa kayo!"

    **kung nagrereklamo ka at malaki na babayaran mo sa interest di sana nagbayad ka nang sa gayon hindi ka maninisi ng ibang tao!yung mga hindi nagbayad alam nila prinsipyo nila.baka pwede gamitin mo naman utak mo!hindi nagmamagaling tawag dun NANININDIGAN lang sa alam nilang tama.

    ReplyDelete
  63. "Sana lang magiging maayos ang paglaki ng anak mo.... hindi sya ang magdusa sa mga kasalanan mo..."
    Yan ba ang curse sa iyo!
    That line is only to remind ella na may anak sya na kailangan pangalagaan ng husto.....If you do not know....marami na mga kaso na ang kasalanan ng mga magulang ay sa anak ang epekto......Nagshare lang naman ng opinion and nag remind....Huwag mong sabihin nag curse kasi ang intention ko is good. Siguro ganyan lang talaga ang mga mind set ng mga taong mahilig mag curse at ikaw yun.......Pasensya na ha wala sa vocabulary ko ang mag curse kasi akoy may tiwala sa Panginoon at alam ko na justice will prevail.

    ReplyDelete
  64. We should all take a deep breath and wait two weeks for the LWC decision. Then we will know who the hearing officer thought was telling the truth and had the more convincing evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Tp April 7, 2010 4:03PM. Sana lang maging maayos ang buhay mo at mabayaran mo lahat ng utang mo para mapakain mo ang pamilya mo sa Pilipinas.Sana maging maayos din ang buhay mo maski pati Diyos eh dinadamay mo sa kasong mga tao lang naman ang may gawa.Ano naman ang kinalaman ng Diyos sa mga pinipirmahan mong kontrata?

    ReplyDelete
  66. Ano naninindigan ka sa akala mo tama?Akala mo lang tama ka.Eh napatunayan mo bang tama ka nga?Ang sabihin nyo nanghikayat kayo ng mga tao para wag ng magbayad ng 10%.Kung manghihikayat kayo ng tao siguraduhin nyong kaya nyong i-deliver ang mga promises nyo.Moral responsibility ninyo yan sa mga taong hinihikayat nyo at tinatawag nyong mga tanga pag hindi ninyo napasunod!Ginawa nyo ba ang best nyo?Eh kung ginawa ninyo ang best ninyo bakit parang yang jave at janet na yan eh hindi man lang na-orient ng lawyer.Ang tapang sumalang sa witness stand wala pa lang binatbat sa panggigisa ng mga lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  67. To April 7, 2010 4:03PM. Hindi pala curse para sa iyo yang binibitawan mong salita.May problema ka sa judgment.Nag-aral ka ba ng Ethics and Logic ha?Anong tawag mo dyan sa mga linya mo?Unsolicited advice with intermittent sarcasm given by an individual under lucid intervals?

    ReplyDelete
  68. walang nanghihikayat chong! at kahit naman hinihikayat ka, if you have ur individuality-- if your personality is strong because you believe we are wrong, you won't agree to us, to what we believe in. walang tumutok nang baril sa inyo para mag agree ka sa cause nang isang group. y do pick on jave and janet? Bakit parang? You are not even sure! have you had solid background being in the court, processing all those cross examination questions and responding to them? are you really logical enough to understand their answers and how their answers led to the end of the case? if i know wat u know was just the raw answers of janet and jave. Suggestion chong: Go attend different court litegations... listen to how the witnesses are crossed examined so you will know.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Pwede mo bang kutyain ang isang tao tapos sabihan ng maganda at the same time? Napaka-inconsistent mo naman kung ganun ka.Sasabihin mong sinungaling si Ella tapos magsasabi ka ng magandang bagay sa isang anak tapos sasabihin mong good ang intention mo.Napaka inconsistent mo naman.Iremind mo nga muna ang sarili mo bago iremind ang ibang tao.Nakikita mo ang puwing sa kapwa mo pero sarili mong puwing hindi mo makita.Sorry but I can not respect your so-called opinion because that is not an opinion.That's a sarcastic judgment (if you don't want to call it curse)

    ReplyDelete
  70. sino ba yang tao na trying to blame others because of the high interest of payment he/she has for lulu. mga kababayan..... may nanutok ba sa inyo nang baril at nagsabi na wag mag bayad nang 10% kay lulu? bakit may isang tao dito sa blog who is trying to put the blame on others? trying to assert that she/he is receiving high interest now because nag persuade kau na wag mag bayad. I think he/ she should have not been accepted as a teacher in america. She/ he humungous bobo!

    ReplyDelete
  71. walang nanghihikayat?eh anong tawag mo sa mga ipinopost ninyo sa blog: a call to stop paying 10%! hindi ba panghihikayat yan?honestly, ive been in a court litigation.Simple lang yan eh.You must know the facts and issue of the case.Stick to the issue and provide strong physical or documentary evidence to support every allegation.Anticipate all possible questions that may arise from the affidavits you signed and submitted.Review your affidavits and everything that you have stated in those documents.Look at all angles of the facts you have narrated and foresee possible questions.Keep watch of your mouth.Most of the time, the more you talk, the more you make mistakes.Igigisa ka sa sarili mong mantika kung daldal ka ng daldal at hindi mo iniisip ang mga sinasabi.That is especially true if what you are saying is in no way relevant to the issue.Sino ba ang pumili sa jave na yan ha?Wala na bang mas magaling jan?Masyado kasi kayong judgmental noon kaya ni hindi man lang tumulong sa inyo ang ibang teachers na tahimik lang pero they have something between their ears.

    ReplyDelete
  72. hahahaha. yon lang palang high school PLT ang pinag yayabang mo! I pity you. take ka nga nga GRE dito kung papasa ka ba. yabang mo. at saka, bakit ka hindi nag witness for lulu? sana nag witness ka para makita natin ang galing mo. parang napakagaling mo eh. bakit kaya hindi ka nag lawyer.hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  73. i must admit i was pressured kaya hindi na rin ako nagbayad ng 10%.humunguous bobo pala ako kagaya nyo. wala akong ipinagkaiba sa inyo na pipirma pirma ng kontrata samantalang nasa isip lang na napipressure at hindi naman tinutukan ng baril.nasa isip lang na pauuwiin sa Pilipinas kaya dapat pumirma ng kontrata.ngayong sinisingil na eh ayaw ng magbayad kasi naubos sa mall ang pera kaka-shopping kaya sasabihin ko na lang na hindi valid ang contract dahil oppressive. eh bakit ko nga pinirmahan in the first place?dahil napressure ako?humunguos bobo nga!we don't deserve to be here educating the more bobo students.

    ReplyDelete
  74. nagtake na po ako ng GRE.sorry ha kasi pumasa ako.in fact naka-enroll na ako ng isang specialist course.

    ReplyDelete
  75. bakit, tinutukan ka ba nang baril? bakit di ka nag bayad? nagbayad ka nalang sana ng 10%. ang pangit kasi, reklamo lang kayo nang reklamo, ni di nga kayo tumutulong sa mga efforts nang teachers. have you been so vigilant enough? u don't realize that the prime movers don't even think of themselves. ni di nga sinusweldohan. prinsipyo yon. Kay jave tau. yon ngayon ang excuses nyo. magaling ka naman pala eh. bakit di ka nag volunteer. yan daldal ka lang nang daldal ala ka namang naitutulong. ngayon ang ingay mo because u were not satisfied. personally, i am not for jave. i am not saying i am satified with how he answered questions. but i think he also deserves our respect. kung di ba sa jave nag witness, mag wiwitness ka ba? i challenge you. there are a number of cases that are coming up. show me ur arrogance and expertise by becoming a witness. Will recommend you to the lawyers and i will personally salute you.

    ReplyDelete
  76. hahaha. here comes another liar!

    ReplyDelete
  77. oic, grabee talaga ang effect di ba pag anak na ang pinag-uusapan? Ganyan talaga pag ikaw ay isang magulang.....Protect to the max.....yan pa nga lang ang narinig mo about your anak parang pumutok na ang butsi mo.......kaya kung ako sa iyo mag start ka nang gumawa ng mga bagay na hindi makakasira sa dangal ng pamilya mo lalo na sa anak o magiging anak mo.

    pasensya na ha may ethics o wala, may logic o wala.......i dont care....gusto ko lang ipaalam sa mundo ang gusto kung sabihin... at it seems tagumpay ako kasi i am sure nakarating ito sa taong gusto kong pagsabihan.......
    Good luck sa mga fans ni ella n family...hahahahahhaahahhah

    ReplyDelete
  78. http://abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/04/07/10/fg-arroyos-name-dragged-louisiana-teachers-suit

    .....pakitingnan nyo naman po..I think something is wrong in here,,d po ang mga Filipino teachers ang nagsabi that FG Lending is owned by Mike Arroyo..it was the attorney representing UPI who said this...kasi alam kung hindi singkit ang mata ni Arroyo..buwaya lang..nkaharap ko kasi ang may ari ng lending company na ito..dun kasi ako nangutang para ipambayad sa PARS at UPI...hehehehe

    ReplyDelete
  79. hahaha.salamat sa paggugudluck mo sa akin.akala mo kakampi ako ni ella.bwahahaha.isa lang akong taong walang magawa kundi makipag-argue sa taong bobo para maprove ko sa sarili ko na magaling pala ako.bwahahahaha.

    ReplyDelete
  80. hahaha.akala mo bilib pa ako sa mga lawyers ng AFT.siguradong losing case na naman yan.bakit ako magtetestify sa isang case na losing from the outset.hahaha.you can't outsmart me gurl!trying to bait me huh!

    ReplyDelete
  81. There are so many mediocrities coming out from individuals or groups and it is not surprising because for obvious reasons those are from either people whose orientation are never principled to side for justice (mga walang prinsipyo), or from people who simply can’t digest underlying agenda of the case (mga bobo) or people who are fence sitters (mga miron) and some others who are simply carefree (walang pakialam, mangisay kayo, busy ako!). The common denominator among these people is SELFISHNESS!
    Being selfish is not necessarily being wise and practical, as what they claim… and being principled is not necessarily being suicidal.
    Signing the contract with empty stomach doesn’t make you dumb. It is more dumb to let Lulu continue to victimize you. Signing without reading is just one truth behind the story and you can’t tell that it is the main reason which gives Lulu a license to impose the one lopsided contract on us. The court is a court of evidence, yes and the court sees what you cannot see and hears what you cannot hear. The Workforce Commission is a prelude to heavier and stiffer legal and paralegal pursuits and we salute those who put forward themselves not for any other reason but to help. Lawyers are impressed with all the witnesses, and that matters most. Side comments from insignificant sources will in no way dampen our spirits.
    If you are just following the efforts of all the teachers, be it tactical or strategic, you will see the intellect in planning and the balance it undertake in considering the pros and cons on this case. Do not ever charge that what have been said are mere rhetorical, emotional outbursts of the noisy few because you can never prove it. You can criticize all the teachers, AFT and everyone who is helping push this case to greater heights, but you can never pull down not even a single teacher who takes part with the risk and consequences this may give us.
    And one last thing, the only promise that was given to ourselves are not false hopes as what others allege. We vowed to fight for our rights and promise ourselves not to be fooled again..never again. If you believe in that, you know whom to contact. If information were not shared with you, reflect and ask yourselves why.

    ReplyDelete
  82. you don't believe that I took the GRE?it's up to you. that's your prerogative.to say that im a liar,prove!the burden of proof lies on the accuser not on the accused.ganyan ba ang ginawa nyo sa hearing?mukhang baliktad yata.isang folder lang ang dala ng mga lawyers ninyo para sa mga documentary evidence nyo.akala ko nga mag-aapply sa walmart.hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  83. To April 7, 2010 6:22 PM. more rhetorics.how can you tell me that stiffer legal pursuits are coming if you can't even win the first round?were you able to establish the presence of probable cause to warrant initiation of stiffer legal pursuits?more rhetorics.do i need to prove it?why should i?just read everything that you are saying and digest with critical mind and you will know if its rhetoric or not.

    ReplyDelete
  84. asar talo pala kayo eh.mga ibang teachers kasi hindi na lang magcomment sa facts. pati buhay, itsura at anak ng ibang teachers eh hinahalungkat at kinukutya.ngayong alam nyong losing ang case nyo magsalita kayo about the facts of the case and the stupidities you have committed especially you, jave!yang bunganga mo ang nagpapahamak sa iyo.i won't be surprised if someday somebody files suit against you.

    ReplyDelete
  85. sarap naman makipagbalitaktakan ng taong sumasagot sa contentions ng mga sumusulong para sa kasong ito. kampon talaga ni jack, lulu at ella na ala ng mapaglagyan ang ere sa ulo. ang yabang! nakakatawa!

    losing? di ka judge para magbigay ng desisyon sa kaso. hwag ka bibitaw sa pagsubaybay sa blog na ito ha kasi aliw na aliw kami sa kakiputan ng utak mo at lapad ng atay mo.

    salamat sa patawa.

    di mo mabanggit mga panalo ng mga lumalaban ano, maliit man o malaki, kasi ayaw mo iappreciate ang ganda ng hustisya.

    payag ka kayang makipagdebate ng harapan sa tunay na matatalino? sure ako kay jave lang sesemplang ka na. at bakit masyado kang insecured kay jave? mas maganda siya sa yo?

    guronggala at sa lahat ng sumusuporta at naniniwala na may hustisya pa rin, si jack yata yang sumasagot na yan...o baka si ela..o si lulu..hahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  86. The posts from the side of UPI only come from very few people, (siguro nga galing lang yan sa isa or dalawang tao). I supposed they are always hooked on their computers to be able to post nonsense comments. I would like to tell the rest to keep your cool and ignore whatever things they say about the witnesses. Our witnesses did their jobs of telling the truth. We will wait for the decision of the judge. If UPI is too confident, we will not be intimidated. After all, it is always the judge who will decide. Also, on the side of the Filipino teachers, we will not go down to the level of these people who have no other things to say. Remember that they may not be teachers and they have nothing to lose. Let us maintain the professionalism and the integrity that we project.

    Remember that a shallow river creates much more noise than the deep lake.

    Let us hold on together!!!

    ReplyDelete
  87. hahaha.si jave maganda?kabayong bakla!hahaha. Maintain the professionalism and the integrity that you project?Meron ba kayo nun? Hooting in the courtroom when the SOP is silence at all times?That's what you call professionalism?Calling Ella any name you want to call her, ridiculing how she and Arvin look, that's what you call professionalism? Do you have that?Sino ba ang naunang nambabastos sa blog?Di ba kayo?Tumatahimk lang kami noon.Pero sumusobra na kasi kayo eh.Now that I have the time to lambast you, are you able defend yourselves! You resort to argumentum ad hominem.Lousy!Jave has nothing to prove to me anymore.He had his day in court.Did he prove his worth in court?Simple questions lang naa-out of the topic sya.Sya ang gusto nyong iharap sa akin sa debate?ano ba ang alam nyan?Grammar? grammar lang!Walang logic ang depth ang mga arguments nya.Puro kayabangan lang ang nasa utak nya.Pinasuspende ang principal, asus!

    ReplyDelete
  88. april 8, 2010 9:23am

    Hindi kayabangan ang pagiging honest.Ang ginawa ni "mahal" ELLA ang tunay na pagyayabang. Marami cyang 'minutes sa fon' kaya siya ang tinatawagan ni LULU? Kung ma marami cyang minutes, kami maraming 'hours'.hahaha

    Iilan lang kayo na kumukampi ni LULU. Nakita mo naman cguro kung gaano karami yung sumuporta sa
    'wear white campaign'. Kahit media nga hindi na nagsayang ng oras na kunan kau ng statement.

    Pero may nabalitaan ako may taga media raw na mag vivideo sa inyu. taga ANIMAL PLANET

    ReplyDelete
  89. yes, just like the UPI witnesses, comes from the first batch or related to the other one.

    ReplyDelete
  90. hahaha.sige guess lang ng guess kung sino ako.by the way, nakiisa din naman ako sa wear white campaign ah.pero di ko na sasabihin kung saang row ako umupo kasi mabibisto ako eh.don't worry, tatahimik na ako.gaya nga ng sabi ng lawyer kay jave, total wala rin lang naman akong makukuhang matinong arguments sa inyo eh "I rest my case" na.Tama ba ang grammar ko?hahaha.Adios!Hasta la vista!Sayonara!Au revoir!Hanggang sa muli!Bye for now.gotta bring foods to my kids!

    ReplyDelete
  91. talagang sa bobo ka lang makipag argue kasi wala ka talagang laban kung sa mga intelligent ka pakipagbanatan.........cge maawa naman ako sa iyo wala kang ibang maargue kundi ako........tsismosa ka rin pala tulad ko...heheheheh....wala katalagang ma comment about sa case kasi talo na kayo at it shows na wala kang utak makipag argue about it....kaya read between the lines ka na lang....hahahahaha.....maawa naman ako saiyo.....hay nako huwag mo na akong iargue kasi bobo ako..bwahahahahah

    ReplyDelete
  92. alam ko. dun ka umupo sa tabi ni 'mahal'. Kasi nag testify ka para kay LULU.hahaha. 100% po na against LULU ang mga naka white. tamamg-tama yung soot ni arvin. dba orange yun? Magagamit nya rin yung kulay na yun. Free board,lodging and security pa.

    ReplyDelete
  93. I am just observing and studying the comments of this Anonymous who it seems is one ego tripping, intellectually hollow, arrogant, homophobic hypocrite.

    For one, you are talking about professionalism but it is clear from your comments that you have a personal vendetta against Jave. You have tried to mask your personal issues with Jave by putting in seemingly intellectual arguments and points about the case. But you failed in that part because it is clear that your arguments are empty and you simply have an ax to grind against a teacher who has the courage to stand for what is right. In effect you are guilty of argumentum ad hominem yourself.

    Granting, without admitting, that Jave’s or Janet’s or anybody else’s testimony may not be very good in the presentation of the case, that doesn’t mean that the case is weak. And it’s not as if the testimonies of UPI’s witnesses are excellent comparatively. But more important is the fact that the testimonies are only part of the overall argument presented to the commission. Have you read and studied the pre-hearing briefs and the memorandum of both sides? Most likely you haven’t. Well, I have. And right there you will see that the arguments of UPI are inadequate and are simply trying to circumvent Louisiana laws. Again, the testimonies are only a part, and the commission will base their decision on the other information as well.

    Then you think you are so wise not to come out until you think the case is very strong. First what are your credentials that you can say that you are the one who can declare that a case is very strong? Now again granting, without admitting, that you are indeed the most intelligent person who can determine the win-ability of a case, the problem is you are not privy to our discussions, to our documents, to the documents extracted through FOI, and to our deliberations with our lawyers. How could you assume that you know all the ins and outs of this case? Well, even though “tatlong kriminal na ang napakulong ko sa pinas” I am sorry to say that is a very weak credential. Kahit 100 holdaper pa ipakulong mo, that would be immaterial to the issues we have here.



    There are several terms that can describe those people like you who according to you are very wise not to come out until you are sure that you will win. These types of people are different from those that just don’t care or just apathetic. I think your behavior is even worse that mere apathy. You are what I can call an unprincipled selfish coward, who is only willing to stand up against injustice if all the possible scenarios are good for your own self. Well, we are sorry we have different perspectives. We, behind this blog, are not only thinking about our own gains. We think of other Filipinos as well, who will be victimized if these issues are not brought out in the open. So while we fight for ourselves, we put this struggle in its broader context.

    (continued…)

    ReplyDelete
  94. So win or loose in this particular case, that will not be the end of the world for this struggle. We know that this fight is going to be a long battle. We are not expecting easy wins. But one thing for sure that we can be proud of is that the modus operandi of Lulu Navarro and UPI and PARS are already exposed. Secondly, many of us are now are able to speak our minds and resist the tyranny of Navarro, unlike before where most of us are only satisfied at just bowing our heads in disgust. I don’t even have to enumerate the other gains that resulted from this blog and our struggle as a whole.

    Then you said: “Sino ba ang naunang nambabastos sa blog? Di ba kayo? Tumatahimik lang kami noon. Pero sumusobra na kasi kayo eh.”

    Clearly you don’t understand the essence of this blog, or blogs in general. You have this erroneous notion that all those comments that you think are “unprofessional” (including those who corrected your grammar) can be traced to the people behind this blog. Please think again. Many of those comments are coming from anonymous individuals. As a blog, this is a venue to vent you opinions and even your emotions. The fact that many people including you are able to speak their minds is in fact the very essence of this blog. We can’t even blame those teachers who really despise the behavior of Ella or in fact even despise her very face! Ella, her face and her lies are indeed a representation of the monstrosity of UPI.

    However what is really distasteful is the bigotry that you have against gays. But I will not try to change your homophobic mind. I don’t even want to stop you from expressing your archaic views on gays. It’s good that you are showing the depth of your hypocrisy.

    And lastly, you arrogantly said: “Now that I have the time to lambast you, are you able defend yourselves!” My reply is: BRING IT ON!

    ReplyDelete
  95. pare-pareho kayong mga pilipino at mga guro at maituturing na mga edukado pero sa nababasa ko sa blog na ito ay personalan na ang mga atake sa mga taong kasali at pinagsusupetsahang kasali sa usaping ito. magkaroon naman tayo ng konting delikadisa sa mga sinasabi natin. bago kayo mangbato ng putik sa iba tingnan ninyo muna sa salamin ang mga mukha ninyo. pati yong taong nananahimik at walang pagkukunwaring tumulong ay pinagsasabihan ninyo nang hindi nararapat! ang bawat panig sa usaping ito ang nagkaroon ng sapat na panahon upang paghandaan ang pagharap sa korte at ihalad ang kanilang mga argumento tungkol sa usaping ito. sa panig ni LULU, natural lamang na palabasin nila na legal ang mga kontrata na inyong pinirmahan. ngayon, sa paning ng mga guro bakit yong testigo ninyo ay nagsabing wala silang pinirmahang kontrata? dapat tinignan ninyong mabuti at inunawa ang nakasaad sa inyong "complaint" na gusto ninyong ideklarang "void ab initio" ang kontrata. kapag hiningi mo ito sa husgado ay nangangahulugang may kontrata yon nga lang dapat ay walang silbi ito kasi may bahid ang inyong pagpirma katulad halimbawa ng pananakot o iba pang paraan para mapwersa kayong pumirma. nakita tulong doon ng korte na nagsisinungaling yong testigo ninyo tapos aaminin din naman pala na kanya ng nasabing lagda. dapat naging tapat kayo sa inyong abogado! dapat ang inyong mga abogado ay nag-research ng maayos kasi ang ipinakitang kontrata ng kabila ay yong mga "allegedly" pinirmahan ninyo sa pinas. dapat tiningnan ng inyong mga abogado ang batas ng pilipinas tungkol sa usaping ito at mga desisyon ng korte suprema ng pilipnas para maging isa sa mga batayan ng inyong argumento katuwang ang mga batas na pinaiiral dito sa amerika particular sa louisiana. dapat lahat ng posibleng argumento ng kabilang panig ay inexplore at pinaghandaan ng ninyo at inyong mga abogado para hindi kayo na surpresa! a well research, well written and well reasoned complaint in a given case makes your argument stand-out in court!

    ReplyDelete
  96. gurong sulong, well said! mabuhay ka!

    ReplyDelete
  97. o anu BRING IT ON na raw. laban ka? cguro nagco compose ka pa ng mataas na isasagot na puro english. kaw kasi ang yabang bo.kaya tuloy sinagot ka nang NAPAKAHABANG ENGLISH.
    kriminal napakulong? lamok nga di mo mapakulong eh kriminal pa. ah ok gets ko na. jailguard ka cguro kaya marami kang pinakulong. hehe

    sensya na po. naaliw lang ako sau. alam ko iisa ka lang. eh kami ang dami namin. sa MINUTES pa lang sa fon talo kana.hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  98. april 8, 2010 7:23pm

    i like ur comment kasi mahaba kaya lang may MALI eh. alam mo ba na since june 2009 pa pinag-aaralan ng AFT lawyer ang kasong ito? Eh yung sa kampo ni LULU di nga umabot ng 2 months. Sila ang hindi handa. Kaya nga kung sinu2 nalang kinuha nila. Pinadal si Jack the clown. Director daw ng UPI. Pero pwd ring janitor, secretary. Pwd rin nyang pinturahan ang wall. Talaga naman oh, yun ang planadong sagot.

    Ganito raw ang process sa pag hire ng teachers.
    From Director/JANITOR-JACK:
    first i can tru the yellow pages, then i look for the number of the schools. i will call them and say "hello, do you need teachers?"
    hahaha. parang batibot ah.

    "can you remember what you ate 6 weeks ago?"
    aba humirit pa. gusto na rin yata maging lawyer.

    ...ELLA sumagot ka naman. fans mo kaya ako. miss na kita. ..... MURA

    ReplyDelete
  99. yon naman pala matagal ng pinag-aralan ang kasong ito eh bakit may butas parin ang mga argumento ninyo at ng inyong mga abogado? talo pala kayo ng 2 months lang pinaghandaan ang kasong ito kasi nakahanap pa sila ng butas sa mga argumento ninyo. dapat naging honest kayo sa lawyer ninyo para hindi sila nagmukhang tangga dun nung ipinakita ng kabilang panig yong mga kontrata na pinirmahan ninyo! kaya ko sinasabi ito sainyo kasi concern ako. malaki ang chance ninyo na manalo dito kung aayusin lang ninyo. nung una ang paniniwala ko 90% panalo kayo sa kasong ito pero after nung hearing at mapakinggan yong mga testigo ninyo naging 50-50 ang chance. binigyan ninyo ng buhay si lulu para manalo sa kasong ito. sana lang hindi bigyan ng masyadong diin ng judge ang mga testimonya ng inyong mga testigo kundi bigyang diin ang mga ebedinsyang dokumento na isimumite ninyo sa korte...sana lang kasi kung matalo kayo wag ninyong sisihin ang ibang tao kundi ang mga sarili ninyo!

    ReplyDelete
  100. ganun ba. cge nga sabihin mo kung anu ang basihan mo sa 90% na naging 50-50 na? sana nakita mo yung mga contracts na hinanda ng kampo ni LULU. Kung sa boxing ring side kami. nakikita namin ang mga exhibits nila LULU. eh ikaw general ad ka lang. ang layu ng view mo.

    U mean malakas ang dala nila na contract n nakanotarize 2 months before pinirmahan ng teacher? Lahat naman may butas. Kaya nga may "hearing" eh. Kung walang butas yang ear mo makakarinig ka kaya sa hearing? sensya no po, smart lang ako, hindi matalino. PEACE

    Thanks sa concern mo. Just look at the BRIGHT side men.

    ReplyDelete
  101. April 8,2010 9:41PM - Im worried about your health mukhang di mo naabsorb ang sinabi ni gurongsulong..nose bleed ka no?

    ReplyDelete
  102. Hi, i'm back! Am i nose-bleeding?Hehe.Mahirap kasi pag may anak eh, busy. To all my fans waiting for my reply, here it is:(iba na talaga ang witty!)


    To say that my arguments about jave are empty is a sweeping generalization. First of all, I merely stated the facts: that jave was hilariously out of the issue when the lawyer cross-examined him, that he had to be reminded by the judge to stick to the issue, that he was so arrogant to claim, unnecessarily, that he got his principal suspended. Those are facts, aren’t they?Are they empty arguments?I don’t think so. Facts can never be considered empty arguments because they are facts and not arguments.If you don’t consider that “katangahan”, how then will you call it?Was he just being truthful?Being truthful is a virtue only if what you are saying is related to the issue at hand.Do I have an ax to grind?Well, I know jave as bakla because that’s how he projected himself during the hearing. I know him as arrogant based on what he said during the hearing.I know him as bobo based on how he answered the lawyers.That’s all I know about him.I commented against him based on the facts I know.Now tell me, do I have an ax to grind?Then maybe we should change the technical definition of that phrase to suit your argument.


    You’re right , I didn’t read the pre-hearing briefs and memorandum.Do I need to do that to comment on the case?Briefs and memorandum are just briefs and memorandum.In the realm of evidentiary standards, briefs and memorandum cannot substitute preponderance of evidence,clear and convincing evidence and proof beyond reasonable doubt. For if that is the case, then there won’t be any need for witnesses to the witness stand.


    In criminal cases, the law is very specific as to the requirements that must be present before a crime is said to be committed.Every crime has its specific requirements.If some of these requirements are missing or they have never been committed, then your case is in danger of losing.A lawyer will never say that your case is a losing case for reasons we all know.Under the law, a contract is said to have been established once there is a meeting of the minds which is evidently seen through the signatures of both parties.This contract can be nullified, yes. One way is to prove that your will has been vitiated during the signing of the contract by force, threat or intimidation.And these must be actual and not perceived.I have read your affidavits.Sadly, all your arguments point to only one thing, you felt threatened and forced and you were intimidated.WEere you able to prove that those actually existed?No, because those were mere perceptions.The lawyer asked if you saw guns and weapons during the signing.He was trying to establish one thing - whether or not threat really existed.You said no, right?You don’t need to file suit to know that your case is losing from the very start.It is obvious.I was hoping you will present more credible evidence but you didn’t.The strategy is to fight when you are armed with the right weapon.And the best weapon is your brain-never sign a contract that you haven’t read or you don’t understand! So, am I unprincipled?Of course not! You are unprincipled.You signed a contract, you benefited from it, now you want to run away from it by declaring it illegal.So can you argue that you are principled?why did you sign the contract in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
  103. I thought this blogsite was created so there will be a place to air your grievances. It is an offshoot of your freedom of expression.But freedom has its own limits.You are free to do what you want so long as you are not violating the rights of others.You may claim that it is perfectly legal for you to call people different names because they do not fall within the law’s definition of libel or unjust vexation or slander or oral defamation.But is it moral for you to do that?It is never morally right to do that.You said Lulu is immoral, then, are you different from her?

    The bible says, God created man and woman only.As far as I know, the definition of man and woman has not been changed .You can change your gender because that is culturally ascribed but you can never change your sex.Call it archaic but I don’t want gays to proliferate on Earth.The advent of liberal ideas can never alter my understanding and belief in the bible.


    I rest my case.Pakicheck pala ang grammar at syntax ko ha.welcome naman ako sa mga corrections eh.hehe.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Akala nyo di ako marunong mag-English ha.Well, akala nyo lang yun.Di rin ako nasisindak sa mga rhetorics at fallacious arguments nyo.
    Is-mart ito, oi!(basahin nyo with Bisayan accent para may thrill.ah-hi-hi)

    ReplyDelete
  105. Pero promise talaga, last ko ng pag-open ng blogsite na ito.Sa mga fans ko, nasabi ko na lahat ang gusto kong sabihin.Na-prove ko na rin na matalino ako at kaya kong mag-English.Promise hindi na ako sasagot kaya pasensya na ha.Alam ko mamimiss nyo ako pero talagang ganyan ang buhay.Kailangan kasing asikasuhin ang anak para hindi ako pauwiin ng asawa ko.Hirap maging H4.
    Mi ultimo adios!

    ReplyDelete
  106. So because of your understanding and belief in your God and the Bible, does that give you the right to discriminate and promote hate against a class of people different from you? Indeed that is very Christian.

    ReplyDelete
  107. You call it "rhetorics" everytime you can't understand the depth of the issues. Nice way to hide your dullness!

    ReplyDelete
  108. Akala ko you said you “have the time to lambast” the bloggers. Now that Gurong Sulong said “Bring it on!” sasabihin mo you rest your case! Hanggang dada ka lang pala wala namang laman. Well, since you started putting in your comments it is clear that you don’t really understand what you are saying.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Hoping and praying that everything will be fine after all. I was also a victim but trying to be decent.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Personally, bilib ako sa anonymous na yan.Idol kita 'pre!Napakalogical, comprehensive at legalistic ng sinulat mo.Ang galing mo palang mag-English!

    Syempre naman hindi yan maaappreciate ng mga kalaban mo.Pag sinabing walang laman ang mga sinasabi mo eh dapat nilang patunayan yan.Andaling magsabing walang laman pero wala naman silang ma-identify na mali sa mga sinasabi mo.

    Oo nga akala ko sabi mo may time ka to lambast eh bakit nagsa-sign-off ka na?Wag naman kasi marami akong natututunan sa iyo.Oh baka naman may time ka lang sa araw na yun.Whatever it is, kudos!

    ReplyDelete
  111. yun lang ang time ko mga pre at wala ng iba. wala na kayong mababasang comments sa akin hanggang sa magkaroon ng resolution ang kasong ito. ang bawat panig ay nagkaroon ng time para ilahad ang kanilang mga side sa korte kaya oras na para ipaubaya natin ito sa korte. let the court do their job! kapag lumabas ang resulta saka na lang ulit ako magbigay ng maaayos at nasa legal na comments dito....hirap na baka mapagalitan ako ni misis baka umuwi akong di sa oras.....bantay bata muna ako...hanggang sa muli.bye!

    ReplyDelete
  112. haha, its so funny this anonymous is trying to make it appear that more than 1 sya. well why dont you reply to the points and issues raised by Gurong Sulong if you are so smart?

    ReplyDelete
  113. magandang umaga.

    ReplyDelete
  114. sige nakakaenjoy magbasa ng mga comments ninyo. kayo-kayo nagkakagatan.

    ReplyDelete
  115. after the hearing where are we going now? where is this hearing leading too? Am not as strong as you are but i think we need to be ready and prepared. Kung matalo tayo ano ang sunod na step na gagawin natin? Will the union still be on our side after our witnesses had unsatisfactorily gave their stand? where you able to see the reactions of our lawyers during that moment? hay!

    ReplyDelete
  116. Am not as strong as you are folks. Am just worried of what is to come. After seeing how our witnesses stood infront and the reactions of our lawyers, ano ang susunod nating gagawin? Do you think our lawyers will continue fighting for us? Buti na lang nag absent ako today and i am able to open the blogsite. Please help, I just want to be clarified. siempre we are still waiting after two weeks. paliwanagan nyo ang katulad ko.

    ReplyDelete
  117. ang gandang tingnan ang unity and oneness of the teachers that particular day. sana we all be united all the way.

    ReplyDelete
  118. oi MR.H4!talagang dapat pakainin mo anak mo kasi anak MO yan!!!so parang c Jack ka din pla lahat ginagawa...loving houseband ka ba or takusa?nagpipintor ka din ba or janitor?

    ReplyDelete
  119. it is so good that until now the blogger, claiming under H4, smart and critical, doesn't have the full grasp of the case. it is whether he is trying to miss the points in purpose or points are slipping through his slippery arrogant and lulu-siding faculty.

    one thing which was made clear by the judge and the parties in the recently concluded hearing was whether or not the contract is enforceable in Louisiana...very simple if it is not, then lulu doesnt have the legal right to enforce it on the teachers and the teachers have the right for back claims if necessary. if the decision would be the other way around, then .... i will not tell the next move...the teachers in our group know exactly where the case is leading.

    for lulu's side, her lawyers will always make an appeal in her behalf to get not justice for her but to share from the devoured fat profit as it was only in that hearing when her lawyers knew lulu's scheme. the lawyers will not go to jail if ever, the lawyers will not pay the teachers. what will they loose? nothing! they can always claim lulu has a very weak case and that is why they are loosing. smarter lawyers huh?

    by the way, the evidences presented where earlier summoned and both parties have time to scrutinize them. that is why our lawyers saw every fraud said documents have. that is why lulu's camp were grilled with their own documents.

    as to the witnesses, as far as i know, our lawyers are satisfied with the witnesses.

    some teachers were just too proud to admit that contracts were signed in duress as if such equates stupidity. Let us admit it, in one way or the other, we were fooled by falling on lulu's scheme of being caught in her net first before being fried and there is not much opportunity to be out of that situation.

    let us all wait for the order to be written. we have waited for 2 years to start this case, 2 weeks waiting is nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Sana maibalik na lang ang pera ko more than 200,000 pesos din ang naibigay ko sa PARS. Sobrang hirap, pawis at inutang pa ang iba na hanggang ngaun di pa bayad at tumutubo pa. Pano na kaya ang tulad ko na walang boses. Maibalik pa kaya ang pera ko?

    ReplyDelete
  121. guronggala!ikaw ba ang judge sa kasong ito para malaman mo na panalo na kayo? may satisfied ba sa mga sagot ng testigo ninyo kung yong abogado ninyo ay umiiling ang ulo sa tuwing sablay ang sagot ng testigo ninyo..satisfied pala yon? kapag natalo kayo syempre alangan naman na hindi kayo mag-file ng appeal di ba? sana lang dinurog na ninyo ng todo si LULU dito sa lower court para wala na siyang magawa sa appelate court. tandaan mo na ang appelate court ay mag-review lamang ng desisyon ng lower court. maaring maibasura,mabago at mabaligtad ang desisyong ng lower court kapag may nakitang pagmamalabis sa kapangyarihan,hindi nabigyang pansing ebidensya o testimonya ang lower court ay doon lamang maaaring mangyari ang nauna kung nabanggit. ang appelate court ay hindi na maaaring tumaggap ng bagong ebidensya o testimonya maliban na lang kung ito ay hindi binigyang pansin ng lower court pero mahalaga sa nasabing kaso. ngayon, kung matalo kayo - wag naman sana - sana makahanap ng paraan ang inyong abogado na maituwid ang mga pagkakamali na ginawa ng inyong mga testigo dahil kung hindi sa kangkongngan ang bagsak ninyo. ganun din si LULU oras na matalo siya sa lower court natural makakarating din yan sa korte ng aking nabanggit. masaya ako na matalo ninyo si LULU para naman matigil na ang kanyang pagkagahaman sa pera at makaganti kayo sa mga pinag-gagawa niya sainyo. sana lang yong mga testigo ninyo ay naghanda ng todo para naka-focus lang ang mga sagot dun sa isyu. dapat planado ang lahat na inyong kilos at binitiwang salita sa korte. tandaan ninyo na ang unang gagawin ng abogado ay sirain ang pagkatao at kredibilidad ng isang testigo sa harap ng judge para mawalan ng saysay ang kanyang testimonya. nakita naman ninyo na oras na magkamali ng sagot ang testigo ay sinasamantala ng abogado para makahanap ng butas sa testimonya ng testigo. ang hirap kasi dun sa testigo ninyo ay kailangan lang sagutin ang tanong nang "oo o hindi" ay kong ano-ano na ang idinagdag. kapag tinanong ka kung kumain kana. ang sagot lang ay "oo". wag nang dagdagan pa nang "oo, potato salad ang kinain ko". mali, kasi hindi ka naman tinanong kung anong klaseng pagkain ang kinain mo. ganito ang klaseng sagot ang ginawa ng mga testigo ninyo kaya karamihan sablay. you have to confine your answers to the issue para kahit anong gawing tanong sayo ay hindi kayang tibagin. sana lang maging pabor sainyo ang desisyon at yan ay ipinagdarasal ko. kaya kayong mga guro magdasal kayo na maging pabor ang desisyon ng korte sainyo hindi kong ano-anong mga basura ang pinagsasabi ninyo dito. naturingan pa naman kayong mga guro eh basura naman ang lumalabas sa mga bibig ninyo! YOU PRAY AND UNITE!

    ReplyDelete
  122. I underlined it already even during the initial stages of this case. LA teachers should carry the burden of proof on their allegations of being intimidated or being threatened.....resulting to the signing of contract. OTHERWISE, the other party would be favored by law. Whether the contract is one sided or multi-sided as long it signed by both parties, then it is bonding.
    Of course, filipino style....appeal to the emotions...(kaawa-awa image)..it does not work in the court of law.....(gone are the days of mark anthony and brutus).
    Refusing to pay the 10% interest to UPI was not the solution to stop LULU's alleged injustice...Some credit cards are charging 10-24 or even higher.

    The best way......should have been paying the 10% (because, under contract, it becomes an obligation).....WHILE STRONGLY campaigning against further transaction with UPI. Like sending messages to the Philippines that would discourage every aspirant that there are better agencies than UPI.
    Now to those who are writing on this blog, do you think this would give a good image to the Filipino teachers?
    For most of us, our days as teachers in the US are numbered. US congress have redesigned the budget for education....that is why some are already jumping to other options, I know of some who are busy looking for any US citizen in order to save the legality of her stay here. Imagine, "using LOVE" to advance personal interest? Where is the principle now?
    This is it.....for most of us....we share the greatest lesson in history......and what is that? we never learn from history's lesson.

    ReplyDelete
  123. Sana puro sana. Saan ba tayo dadalhin ng mga sana natin? Dapat noon pa yong SANA. Lord saan kami tutungo, kaming mga makasalanan? I joined the group hoping that i will be enjoying my salary fully with out that 10 % kahit alam ko sa sarili ko at alam kong alam din naman nating lahat na binding ang pinirmahang kontrata sa UPI aminin man sa hindi dahil tulad ng ipinakita ng lawyer e totoo naman na sa bawat pages at sa mga sides nito pirmado tayo. Parepreho tayong nagbakasakali. Pag nagkataon Panginoon sa nangyaring ito mas doble pa sa 10 % ang bubunuin namin. Now, I learned my lesson well "ang maghangad ng kagitna isang salop ang mawawala. At ang langaw pag dumapo sa kalabaw ay mataas pa sa kalabaw." Lord forgive me. Sana nagtiyaga na lang ako nag drop drop sa UPI at hindi nakisunod sa agos. Sarili kong reflection ito, kung same feelings tayo magdasal na lang tayo.

    ReplyDelete
  124. "I joined the group hoping that i will be enjoying my salary fully with out that 10 % kahit alam ko sa sarili ko..."

    That is where one problem lies because it seems that is the only reason you joined the group. Sarili lang palagi ang inisip natin. Bilang mga guro, yan ba ang gusto nating ituro sa mga kabataan? To my colleagues, lets go beyond this kind of thinking and attitude.

    This blog supports our struggle for justice not only for our own gains but moreso for the greater good. Getting financial rewards for our efforts will only be a bonus, like the icing on the cake.

    I understand that we all need the money (our hard-earned money) for our respective families but lets keep in mind that the issue is more than that.

    Further, never did this blog or the group claim that this battle will be an easy win. Lets not forget that this greedy Lulu is used to these kinds of criminal activities and she will definitely put up a fight.

    Lets persevere and stand firmly for the truth and our principles.

    ReplyDelete
  125. "The best way......should have been paying the 10% (because, under contract, it becomes an obligation)....."

    This is exactly what Lulu wants us to do. Why would you reward the oppressor? You say, because there is a contract. But that is the very contract that we are trying to nullify. It is clear that Lulu manipulated the whole process so that we will be in a situation that we will be forced to sign that grossly unfair contract. So why would you continue paying if the contract is in question? If a court nullifies the contract then we will not have to wait for the refund or maybe risk of not being able to recoup our payments, knowing how swapang Lulu is. If on the other hand a court decided to enforce the contract then you pay if you want to. (But personally, my opinion is that we still shouldn't pay until all remedies are exhausted.)

    The move not to pay 10% is definitely a correct move. It is clear that charging us 20% upfront is not only against Philippine laws but also against Louisiana laws. Charging us upfront 20% of our expected annual income is already illegal and oppressive. Why would you pay another 10%? Parang hinoldap ka na, tapos nagrequest pa ang holdaper na magdeposit ka ng dagdag na 10% sa bank account nya!

    ReplyDelete
  126. Sa pagkakaalam ko naman eh may na-file na kaso questioning the validity of the contract.Therefore, wag munang magbayad ng 10% hanggat may ruling tungkol sa kasong yan.Anong opinion ninyo tungko dyan?Pakitanong naman sa mga lawyers.Pag natalo ang kaso magbabayad ako kay lulu syempre pero sana wala ng interest.

    ReplyDelete
  127. ma'am, ako po ay hindi abogado pero dahil sa ang kaso ay nasa korte at naghihintay na lamang tayo ng desisyon, ang korte po ang may masasabi sa inyong concern kung magbabayad ba kayo ng 10% plus interest o yong 10% lang. hintayin na lang po natin kong ano ang sasabihin ng korte sa ilalabas nitong desisyon sa nasabing kaso. sana panalo po tayo para wala tayong babayaran. saka po kung sakaling matalo tayo dito mag-file naman ng appeal sa mas mataas na hukuman. kung matalo parin po tayo dun at sabihin ng korte na magbayad tayo saka lang po mangyayaring magbabayad tayo kay LULU....pray na lang po tayo na manalo saan mang korte makarating ang kasong ito para wala tayong bayaran kay LULU. salamant po!

    ReplyDelete
  128. It seems that UPI is never contented of all the overcharges they have asked from the teachers. They still want to impose the falsified contracts. Well, no wonder guys. If Lulu was able to commit identity theft here in the US quite easily, how could she not produce any documents that will bear our signatures but the dates are mysteriously placed??? If we go stricter with the contract, UPI has violated all of us first!

    Lulu, please SAVE yourself. We only want you to go to jail but it seems that you want BOTH. You want to visit JAIL and and live in HELL!!! Well, I think the two would be a great package for you. Happy Trip then!!!

    ReplyDelete
  129. Bakit di ka yata nagtestify Ms. Ingrid? Di ba dapat ay ikaw ang unang una naming makikita don?
    Ayaw mong umappear??????? Ikaw naman ang promotor ng lahat ng ito! Paki explain nga at bakit ang mga alalay mo lang ang ipinain mo? O baka naman nakaalis na ako at di kita nakita!!!!!!! number one fan mo pa naman ako... he he he

    ReplyDelete
  130. maiba naman tayo ng topic, puro na lang kayo dimanda laban sa isat isa, pilipino sa pilipino, wala talagang pagbabago ang ugali nating mga pilipino! siraan ng siraan, wala na kayo sa pilipinas eh ganun pa rin ang thinking ninyo! ang tanungin nyo ngayon sa sarili ninyo ay kung may trabaho pa tayo sa susunod na school year? wala tayo sa bansa natin para umasta ng ganyan na akala mo ay kung sino tayo? wala pa tayong dapat ipagmalaki sa katayuan natin dito sa america, ano ang laban natin sa mga puti at itim na yan? hindi natin alam kung ano ang pinag-uusapan ng mga yan pag nakatalikod na tayo, akala nyo ba kakampihan kayo ng mga yan??? nagkakamali kayong tunay! yan ba ang pinagyayabang nyong pwersa? magisip-isip kayo, isipin nyo na dayuhan lang tayo dito, at ang mahalagang isipin ninyong lahat ay may pamilya tayong binubuhay sa pilipinas, ang ipinunta natin dito sa america ay trabaho hindi po gulo, mapapakain nyo ba ang pamilya ng mga guro kung sakaling mawalan sila ng hanapbuhay? etong mga promotor ng demanda na eto ay yan ang mga hindi tunay na guro, nagpanggap lang silang guro para makarating dito sa america sa tulong na rin ni luluga. yun iba jan ay nagmamarunong pero sa totoo lang ay sila ang mga walang experience sa pagtuturo, ni minsan ay di nagturo sa eskwelahan sa pilipinas? sana maisip natin sa isat-isa na pareho lang kayong nag-gamitan. sana sa susunod na pag-salang nyo sa hot seat ay handa at preparado kayo sa lahat ng itatanong sa inyo, kumain muna kayo para di kayo magutom at maintindihan nyo ang mga babasahin nyo. sana magkaisa na tayong mga pilipino dito sa louisiana, trabaho na lang tayo ng maayos para walang problema at matutuwa pa ang mga mahal natin sa buhay na naiwan natin sa pilipinas.

    ReplyDelete
  131. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  132. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  133. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  134. Curious lang ako.Si Ingrid hindi totoong teacher?Balita ko taga call center sya.Kaya siguro di tumestigo kasi wala din palang credibility.Marunong din palang bumili ng teaching certificate sa Recto!hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  135. Naku po.Paano pag nalaman ng EBR at State department of education na peke ang mga dokumento nya?Pwede ba syang kasuhan?

    ReplyDelete
  136. Pssst..magreklamo kayo sa principal nya at deped kya pla may PRC license siya,may level 3 certification at teacher of the year siya kasi hindi siya totoong teacher!!madami talagang kayong nalalaman!paano pa kaya yung totoong teacher?!!samahan ko kayo gusto niyo?pakilala kayo para libre carpool!!

    ReplyDelete
  137. Again,the tactic of Lulu's side is to regain the support of the teachers who were once with them and are now awakened. And because they can't gain them back easily, they must have very aggressive strategies to win their hearts back like aggravating them with the made up stories posted in the blog! As we know we are issue driven here!

    Now all of us should be aware that:

    1) They want to focus on Jave and Janet because they testified and told the truth and once these two will be in the limelight, they would be able to cover up the stupidity shown by JACK in the court. I can't tell if Jack was simply faking it or he is really incapable of understanding the meat of the questions.

    2) They attack Ingrid because they think that once they mention the name of Ingrid, Lulu can be hidden in Ingrid's shadows. As we all know, the court did not look for Ingrid, the court looked for Lulu. Why ask how come Ingrid did not appear and testify? WE SHOULD "ASK WHY LULU HAD TO SEND A DUMMY?"

    3) They post comments that seem to be from our end attacking names of people whom they think will be by their side once more. I just discovered this! We all know who presented so much LIES at the court. The audience could readily tell at each time a lie was told. So guys, we will again refocus on the issues not on people. If they drop names of people, we know it is not what we focus... we stick to our issue and our cause.

    4) Intimidation-this is their strategy ever since. They want the people to get scared again and to stop. The demand letters that they sent is one example of how they harrassed and intimidate people. We had enough of this. We became much stronger!

    5) To Ingrid: I know you have always been a very strong woman and simply wanted to remain silent of your achievement. But since they want you to bring it on, tell them that you are a true and super teacher. They only want to weaken your spirit, which they will never succeed. INGRID YOU ARE A GOOD TEACHER! Well, if they say that you used to work at a call center and then went back to teaching, that is still a lot lot better than being a director becoming a janitor at UPI or being a husband into a dummy or being a MedTech Graduate graduate into a Convicted Felon! So Ingrid, you still rise above them. Chin Up TEACHER OF THE YEAR:-) We are proud of you!

    6) UPI also believed that they can buy justice even here in Louisiana because they have all the dollars to afford it. But not all judges can be bought. WE STILL HAVE GOOD PEOPLE working in the JUDICIARY Department and not all people are like Lulu. UPI... YOU CAN'T BUY JUSTICE as you think!!! SORRY!

    7) They want to create faction again because OUR SOLIDARITY IS A THREAT!!! UPI, you just made us stronger!

    ReplyDelete
  138. style ng kampo ni lulu bulok!

    si ingrid ay nakapagturo at may PRC license sa pinas at certified at highly qualified na magturo sa louisiana. teacher of the year pa.

    si lulu may lisensya bang mag operate ng business sa louisiana? o sa california?

    si ella, may marriage license ba? ay, hwag na itanong to, di naman pala to kasama sa issue. lol!

    ReplyDelete
  139. andali palang maging teacher of the year ano?magturo ka lang ng tungkol sa mga robot robotan nang walang bayad tignan mo teacher of the year ka na.hahaha.nasubukan nyo ng magstay sa skul hanggang 9pm ng gabi?tignan nyo magiging teacher of the year kayo.andali!kumusta naman ang teaching strategies, teaching methodology, students' performance?try kaya nyang magturo sa valley park nang masubukan ang pagiging teacher of the year.pag may PRC license ba ibig sabihin may teaching experience na rin sa Pinas?i wonder kung anong teaching experience ang ipinagmalaki sa interviewer para makarating ng Amerika.

    ReplyDelete
  140. If you think being nominated "Teacher of the Year" is an easy task, why were you not nominated as one? If you think you are more qualified (teaching experience wise in the Philippines)then prove it. She passed the interview in the Philippines that means she is good like you. She is nominated "Teacher of the Year" among others in her school, that means she's better than you. She got a scholarship at LSU as per recommendation of her principal that means she's something. She is representing EBR in Robotic conferences in other states that means she got brains.... EBR has their confidence in her. Why should'nt you? You're a Filipino, right? You are of the same blood! Isn't it a shame on your part trying to discredit your own people? Why are you trying to destroy her credibility? Is that the best you can do? Now I understand what "crab mentality" is all about. Why don't you just prove your worth and be the best wherever you are. Good teachers can thrive wherever they are and in whatever situation. That's it...

    ReplyDelete
  141. i pity those teachers who claim ingrid to be not a full blooded teacher and they imply that she has no right to be here because of allegedly questionable teaching experience.

    the anology is the same with the aged but not matured and vice versa.

    your defense is so lame.

    i wont be surprised if you will impress gratitude on lulu for coming here. maybe the real story is you are licensed and experienced teachers in the philippines who were not able to pass the ebr interview but were brought in here by lulu because you consented to pay more. wait until uscis get you on that. ask lulu to bail you out.

    prove your worth by doing better in your jobs and not by throwing mud to the best teacher there is in ebr.

    loosers!

    ReplyDelete
  142. It makes it more exciting!!! They wanted to put Ingrid down but sad to say, they get it the other way. Now, many people know Ingrid is a good teacher and a Teacher of the Year! Don't worry Ingrid, it is still in your favor. You don't have falsified documents. Unlike PARS and UPI, it is their way of life to produce false documents. Until now, I can't understand how in the world they produced contracts that appeared to be signed by teachers on those dates the teachers never went to PARS. Isn't that monstruously amazing???

    ReplyDelete
  143. the two-week time line is coming soon......watch and see........it will only boil down to one thing......nagsimula ang lahat sa ating hangarin na makapunta nang america....and all the rest are varied stories......!

    ReplyDelete
  144. pag wala pa ang PARS at UPI, ano na man kayang agency ang nagdala sa atin dito? 'yong pamimike nang licensya at teaching experience sa pinas ay pareho din yan sa ginawa nang PARS at UPI. we will reap what we planted.....it's payback time!

    ReplyDelete
  145. Well, most of our friends who came here through other agencies are far better than us. They were not overcharged! They were not harrassed! They were not threatened! They were not deceived! They were not victims of LULU!!!! Why are you so confident that the judge will make you win? Do you really think your case is strong?

    ReplyDelete
  146. Let us also salute all other Filipino Teacher's of the Year in their respective schools. Could somebody please post all of their names.

    Everyday, we go to work and give our 200% on the job, doing our very best in an effort to touch the lives of our students, hoping that we will make a difference in their future. And despite the difficult circumstances were in with the agency, we still manage to keep going as if we were not yelled at or humiliated by Lulu, as if nothing happened the last meeting with her. It sure is not easy to carry this burden, but we all managed!

    So here is a kudos to all of us who work hard everyday as we struggle to create a better world for our students!

    Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  147. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  148. here it is. being a good teacher and a teacher of the year for that matter does not offset the fact that you have submitted a fraudulent information by not stating your true number of years of teaching experience. you still committed fraud. and being an employment agency (PARS & UPI)- that brought the teachers here in america (EBR) to teach- which made the teachers signed a questionable contract does not offset the fact that the agency betrayed the teachers. still, UPI and PARS committed fraud. so now, what is the difference between a teacher of the year and the self-proclaimed saviour employment agency? no, they have both committed fraud! please be reminded the EBR people is now bigenning to investigate...

    ReplyDelete
  149. Let the investigation begin! You know, you can't put a good woman down. If you are pretty sure that Ingrid indeed falsified any document, well, go to EBR and prove it. Give them the right info....Why are you so mad at Ingrid by the the way? Did you ever feed her her? Did she ever bother you at all? Did she owe you money? Or her presence simply gives you a feeling of inferiority? You just can't stop the urge of throwing stones to a tree that bears so much fruit.... you want to take part of it. If you want to bear fruit, cultivate, nurture and hone your own abilities. Who knows, you will be the next "Teacher of the Year". Be real!

    ReplyDelete
  150. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  151. What are related to the topics? That there is or some teachers who have fake transcript of records, bought from Recto Avenue? I think the teachers should weed out this person. That will bring more strict checking from EBR.

    ReplyDelete
  152. Not Ingrid but somebody else have fake Recto papers. That's according to stories around..

    ReplyDelete
  153. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  154. can't wait sa decision ng case. gud luck sa lahat!

    ReplyDelete
  155. if there are teachers with recto papers, that is another issue the agency needs to face. but the good teachers should not be suffering as an offshoot of this new issue.

    well, as long as we have the authentic documents and truth behind us, nothing will put our knees to shatter.

    teachers who are guilty of anything, here and back in the philippines, are only the ones who need to face said issue.

    for us, just lay back and relax...no matter how hard ebr will be on its scrutiny, i won't worry.

    ReplyDelete
  156. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  157. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  158. Hi there. Whoever is the administrator of this blog, remove posts that talked about Mr. Galido. Posts about him is out of the issue here for they do not coincide with the purpose of this blog. Again, we are dealing with UPI and PARS and not other people. UPI and PARS will be happy to find out there are other matters that will cover them up:-) Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  159. please remove unnecessary posted comments in here. we have a lot of sensible and important things to talk to.....and who messes up another man's wife? be careful because it might be you!ang tunay na lalaki hindi pumapatol sa issue at tsismis that you're trying to spread through this blog.where are the proofs of your allegation? patunayan mo nga? "Where is your morality? morality mo kamo ang intindihin mo kc in the first place ikaw ang nagpost ng tsismis dito. don't mess up this blog with your own created issue para sumikat. this blog is purposely created to bring out the sentiments of teachers against UPI and PARS at hindi sa mapanghusga mong mga mata na puno ng puwing. akala mo kung sino kang mgsalita at nagmamalinis pa! Saan ang sinasabi mong morality? yang paninira ng kapwa mo? manahimik ka na lang because you exactly don't know what you are doing and what you are posting.

    ReplyDelete
  160. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  161. If I can recall, Mel Villarba scolded one of those teachers in our batch because the teacher did not like to follow what he instructed. The teacher had 3 years experience but Mel instructed her to tell the interviewer that she had 5 years experience. Good thing that the teacher did not follow. She just told the truth and the truth was what mattered. The teacher still passed the interview. And you know what we discovered why Mel forced her to say 5 years instead of 3 years??? Simple... the salary schedule that he was looking at that time would make the teacher pay hundreds of dollars more if the 5 years experience is the basis. WOW!!! It still boils down to money. NO WORRY! WHY ARE THEY SCARING PEOPLE THAT EBR WILL DO SCRUTINY? THE TRUTH WOULD STILL PREVAIL!

    ReplyDelete
  162. anu pala yung posts regarding ke depol, edgar, ella na personal, related ba yun? so pera lang pala yung tungkol sa blog na ito. mabawi lang ang pera. nasaktan ang mga pride sa gawa ni lulu kaya umalma tayo?

    i don't agree the above persons pero hindi naman tama na patayin ang issue. remember meron anak na na mention sa original na post. baka madamay pa yung blog na ito pag itanago yan. meron na signs sa mali ang gawain ng taong yan pero hinayaan natin.

    dapat magbago na ang taong yan. papayagan mo ba yung anak mo ay hawak hawakan? anung ituturo mo sa anak , na ok lang hawakan?

    ReplyDelete
  163. To Anonymous who posted at this time 04-13; 8:36pm :

    Do you think by posting your comments here about Mr. Galido, will prove something? If indeed he did something why don't you say straight to his face that the act he is doing is very offensive? Why use this kind of venue to air out this very sensitive matter? It is very obvious that you are not after to correct the person but to totally destroy the person. What is your point? Indi pa ba enough na magtsismisan kayo?

    Ang hirap kasi naki-kinig ka lang sa usap usapan ni wla kang proof sa nangyayari talaga...Ano ba pinanggagaliiti mo sa pamilya nya at sa kanya? Dahil ba sa nakakasurvive sila sa buhay nila despite ng pinagdadaanan nila? Kung matino kang tao at concern ka tlga sa mga tao sa paligid mo especially sa mga "Female Filipino Teachers" at sa mga anak nila... be man enough kausapin mo yng tao...Di mo magawa at dito mo ini-air ang opinion mo, kasi hanggang opinion ka lang... You don't really know the person or his family.

    Let us just stick to the real issue why this blog is here. This blog is not a venue for gossips and scandals.

    ReplyDelete
  164. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  165. I agree with the two personages who commented before me. Guard your wife and kids to be if you don't have your kids yet. Now, if you are still planning to have your own kids too here in America, well that's good because you can have your naturally born American baby also. That's what you need to focus on and not the life of Mr. Galido and his family. Pakialamero, wala ka naman sa tamang lugar at punto!

    ReplyDelete
  166. korek ka dyan kung hindi sa kano, sa kapwa pinoy nakikipagkaringkingngan! at siya nga pala yung pasimuno nito ay AKTIBISTA sa pinas! galit sa mga patakaran ng Amerika. bakit ka nga pala nandito sa amerika eh sa pinas halos isumpa mo ang bansang ito????? isa kang tupperware! hepokrita!

    ReplyDelete
  167. This blogsite is dedicated to the community of Filipino migrant teachers based in Louisiana as well as other states all over the USA. It aims to be a venue to share our dreams and stories, our joys and pains, our experiences and struggles...

    ReplyDelete
  168. To Anonymous of
    April 14, 2010 7:14 AM

    Ang galing galing mo naman. Pakilala mo naman ako sa pasimuno, kilala mo pala? kahit AKTIBISTA pa siya gusto ko siya makilala. papasalamatan ko siya kasi kung di dahil sa kanya ang daming kagaguhan pa gagawin sa atin ng mga mapangsamantala.

    kung nagbago siya ng pananaw sa amerika kanya na yun basta ba di kukupas pakikipagsapalaran nya para sa isyu natin mga teachers, ok na yun.

    saludo ako sa pasimuno nito, maging sino ka man mahal kita!

    ReplyDelete
  169. sa sinasabi nila na pasimuno, SALUDO AKO SA KANYA.if not because of her, wala ang lahat ng ito. wala sanang hearing, wala sanang kaso.

    ReplyDelete
  170. para sa AKTIBISTANG tupperware daw taas kamay ako sa'yo dahil pasimuno ka man ng lahat ng ito atleast alam mo ang tamang prinsipyo.hindi tulad ni anonymous of april 14,2010 7:14AM malamang kasamhan mo si Mr.H4 o yung nagsasabi na may 100 siyang pinakulong na tsismoso at walang bait sa sarili kaya sinusuka ng karamihan na nakakakilala sa'yo!!!kung avid fan ka ng mga taong nagsimula nito EMERSON lumabas ka na sa palda ng asawa mo buking ka na!!!magpakaLALAKE ka!!kawawa ka naman wala ka ng trabaho kaya blog nalang inaatupag mo!

    ReplyDelete
  171. Kung walang hearing at walang kaso, eh di tahimik sana tayo, di ba? but i never question the quest of this blog. what i'm trying to air out is that,yong promotor tungkol sa issue ni Mr. Galido. we need to put period on such issue in this blog right now. it's so, so nonsense!

    ReplyDelete
  172. ingrid, aktibista ka pala? sabi taga call center ka? dami mo namang nagawa at ginagawa.

    kahit ano pa man, huwag mong ititigil ang laban na ito ha, dami malalaglag. patunayan mo na di ka tupperware at taga recto..hahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  173. oo nga. saan na yung original na post re Mr Galido? na delete ng blog amdinistrator. pakibalik nga at mapag aralan.

    ReplyDelete
  174. akala ko certified and highly qualified si ingrid?bakit naman magki-claim ka ng ganun kung wala pa namang certificate na natatanggap mula sa state department of education.i checked into her records, it says OS 471009 valid until 11/06/2010.magpa-file ka na ba ng renewal?asikasuhin mo yan kundi hanggang november lang visa mo.nahihirapn ka na bang kumuha ng certification na totoong nagturo ka sa pinas for a certain number of years kaya di pa napapalitan ang OS mo?punta ka sa recto.dami dun. o kaya patulong ka kay mel villarba.sya ba ang nagturo sa iyo noon na kumuha na lang ng certification sa tabi-tabi?

    ReplyDelete
  175. sa sobrang busy ni ingrid di yata nakapagfile ng OS. salamat sa paalala ha, sasabihan ko siya at sigurado ako sa kakaintindi nya sa iba di nya naifile ang certification na yan.

    thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  176. Naku Emerson, iniiba mo nnman ang usapan. Nabanggit lang ang pangalan mo, ibinalik mo na naman kay Ingrid. Aminin mo na kung sino yung sinasabi mong AKTIBISTA kasi malabong si Ingrid yun. Obviously marami kang alam, baket di mo mabbanggit ang pangalan ng kaibigan mong si Mayee? Traydor ka talaga, dati kay Lulu ka, ngayon sumisiksik ka nman sa mga teacher.

    Mgapakalalaki ka naman kung lalaki ka nga.

    ReplyDelete
  177. hahaha.certified and highly qualified pala ha!

    ReplyDelete
  178. sa mga kaguluhang ito, magbibigay pa kaya ang EBR ng immigration visa sa atin? I doubt it...Lord have mercy!!!

    ReplyDelete
  179. mayrun tayong makukuha sa EBR "exit visa" pauwi ng pinas kasi tapos na kontrata natin sa kanila...wag naman sana, Lord....hula ko lang po ito ha, wag po kayong magagalit kung hindi kayo sang-ayon sa komento ko. ang result ang kaso sa aking kutob ay "valid ang kontrata pero kailangan ibalik ni Lulu yong sobra-sobrang placement fee na sinigil sa atin". yan po ay hula lang...ang magalit papangit..hehehehehe..

    ReplyDelete
  180. IMPORTANT NOTE FROM THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THIS BLOG: Please refrain from using this blog to discuss unrelated issues. We will removed those comments as those are considered spam. We also decided to delete the other comments who suggested that we remove those unrelated entries as it mentioned the issue. Thank you for understanding.

    ReplyDelete
  181. si Ingrid may level 3 certificate?! sobra namang panlilinlang yan!tignan nyo nga teachlouisiana.net. sa pagkakaalam ko pwede kang maglevel 3 kung MA holder ka. OS pa nga lang sya di ba?ni hindi man lang sya certified dito sa louisiana.kaya pala walang pakundangan kung lumaban sa ebr kasi patapon pala talaga mga documents nya.gusto nya may kasamang mapauwi sa pinas kaya gustong idamay ang ibang teachers na maayos ang dokumento.lalaban pa ulit kayo sa immigration fee.wag na nga ninyong pakialaman yan kasi willing naman ang karamihan sa mga teachers na magbayad basta ipetition lang ng ebr.sige ka ingrid marami ng galit sa iyo.sukdulan na yan kung dahil sa panggugulo mo at ng kampon mo eh hindi magpetition ang ebr.kung hindi pa kayo pumapasa sa praxis at hindi kayo ipetition wag kayong mandama.pls lang.willing kaming magbayad kasi mas mahalaga ang green card sa amin kesa konting pera na matitipid namin.

    ReplyDelete
  182. korek ka jan anonymous.maski pa $5000 babayaran ko maging green card holder lang.kung yung iba nga nagpapakasal sa mga amerikano maski hindi naman nila totoong mahal basta maging citizen yan pa kayang $5000 ang hindi ko kayang bayaran.pera lang yan.wag nyong idepensa yang prinsipyo ninyo.may mga anak ako sa pinas na kailangan kong protektahan.hindi ako nananakot pero pag yan idinamay ninyo ....kilala ko ang mga lider lideran sa fox hill.

    ReplyDelete
  183. masyado kang affected sa certification level in ingrid ah, ala ka na bang ibang makita? OS makes us certified, passing certain praxis test makes us highly qualified at both nun meron si ingrid. u need MA para maging level 3, who needs one if your concern is stay lang? pareho lang ng level 2 yun, 5 years. and one thing 2 weeks lang sa doe ang certification process, relax!

    dahil sa kasong ito napigilan ang madaliang pagtatanggal sa mga teachers, kung wala ito mayat maya ang tsugian, di mo magets yun kasi u are zeroing na dahil dito magtatanggalan and kulit din ng analysis mo, yan sabi sa yo ng mam lulu mo no.

    basta ako, ingrid, tuloy ang laban. hayaan natin yung iba, inggit na, selfish pa!

    ReplyDelete
  184. walang paki pero concernedApril 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM

    ano na resulta ng hearing? hwag na pag usapan mga ibang tao dito, wala akong pakialam kay ingrid, kay jave o kay janet, ella, depol, at kung sinosino pa. Lalong ala akong paki kay galido, mr. h4, emerson, etc...ano ba...pwede bang mag stick sa isyu ang blog na to? personalan na, nakakababa ng morale.

    pwede bang sensible comments lang related to the issue ipalabas dito?

    adminisrators, gawan nyo ng paraan to. filter nyo, kakahiya ipabasa sa iba.

    ReplyDelete
  185. Walang paki pero concerned,

    We appreciate your concern and understand your suggestion. However, we don't believe that filtering all those comments will be a good step. We value freedom of expression so much that we will defend anybody's right to speech even if it's exercised in poor taste, intellectually shallow or even repugnant.

    But we will continue to enforce our policy that all those completely unrelated comments and other spam will be removed.

    Further, we believe that most joining in our conversation here or even those who are simply reading are capable in recognizing superior ideas and comments apart from those shallow, below the belt and stupid remarks especially those planted by Lulu and cohorts.

    At the end of the day, the task of making this blog a better hub for discussing our issues rest not on us, the administrators, but in every one of us joining this conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  186. thank you administrator, comments about the looks of a person or the character of a fellow teacher/husband of a teacher is not the issue here. The blog is only for the things that we've been fighting for.. not for anything else. Para sa mga taong mahilig mambuska ng kapwa ukol sa kaanyuan ng iba, oy, kapatid, manalamin ka muna... Its not the looks of a person but its the character... tama na...

    ReplyDelete
  187. bakit ang yabang yabang nang mga naka level 3 kuno dyan na certificate, ha? aba, dahil lang naman yan sa mga MA MA han nyo ah. if i know, ung MA mo ay nakuha mo sa college of ewan, or MA mo nakuha mo within six mos. akala nyo naman di mo alam kung anu ang laro sa pinas. pakita nyo ang abilidad nyo sa pagtuturo. di yong level sa certification. after all it won't spare you from being terminated. buti pa ang level 1 na ma rehire for the next year kaysa level 5 na ma terminate naman. anu bayan. back to the topic na kayo. ipinakita nyo talaga ang pag ka pinoy nyo.

    ReplyDelete
  188. To the anonymous who question the credentials of Ingrid and attacks the teachers who comprise the force behind this movement. You are clearly clueless on what is happening around you. Or you are so blinded by your loyalty to your master Lulu.

    Can't you see that all these efforts galvanizing against your boss and her few remaining lapdogs (including you) is a product of more and more teachers seeing the light and mustering the courage to fight back. What makes our unity strong is our common experience and our thirst for justice. That is different from the selfish interest that keeps you licking your master's ass.

    Yeah, we know that it is hard to fathom that a few poor teachers armed only with the quest for justice could start a movement that now effectively challenges a rich greedy hardened criminal like Lulu Navarro.

    Yeah, we know it is hard to imagine that your manipulative and scheming master Lulu Navarro seems powerless to stop the exposure of her criminal operations through a simple blog.

    Yeah, we know... That is why you are so desperate to just attack Ingrid and this movement. But well, you surely have a reason for your desperation. The downfall of your boss is also your downfall. And what do you expect from unprincipled losers like you?

    ReplyDelete
  189. Wait for something good to come out!!!! exciting.....

    ReplyDelete
  190. Do not belittle anyone only to find out that you are overly insecure. Whether they got their Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3, that is the fruit of their labor. Whether they got their certificates through online courses, rush courses, second courses and scholarship grants and whether they got it from US or Philippines, it is still the fruit of their labor. Just be mindful that ENVY is a deadly sin and you may be doomed to commit it because of GREED and PRIDE!.

    ReplyDelete
  191. Question? May trabaho ka ba next school year o wala na? (as teachers ha!!!)....iyon lang na man ang intention natin kung bakit tayo pumunta dito eh....iyon nga din ang dahilan na kung bakit pomirma tayo nang kung ano ano....Pagbutihin na lang natin ang natitirang mga araw natin sa LA. I really doubt if most of us will be refired next school year......and I doubt if other states would welcome us.....there is no such thing as group struggle here. Pinoy pa.....personalan lahat. Kumapit na yong iba sa mga ano-ano.

    ReplyDelete
  192. alam nyo kahit anung gawin nyo tanga pa rin kayo kasi yung mga kasamaham\n nyo nag issue na ng cheke para magbayad kay lulu. sa takot na makipagshare sya sa mga expenses na pababayaran sa inyo pagnanalo si lulu. si ella, walang pakialam sa inyo, hindi nga sya nagbabasa, di nga nya alam nangyayari sa paligid nya,,tanungin nyo kaharap nyo kasi nagbayad na yan,,,, panalo pa rin si lulu kasi walang nangyari sa kontrata nyo!!!!bigyan ko kayo ng clue------- DdG!

    ReplyDelete
  193. Teachers sending you checks??? I doubt it. You are even dying to collect from the teachers and intimidated us by sending demand letters even if it was not the righful thing to do because you are in dire need of money to pay your lawyers. We all know you have many more lawsuits to face. Sorry, you get nothing from the teachers anymore. It is enough that you got 20 thousand dollars already.And you know what the truth is???CRIME DOES NOT PAY... UPI and PARS PAY!!!

    ReplyDelete
  194. gusto mo ng evidence that some of your co-teachers rushed in sending checks to UPI just last week? gusto mo date pa? April 15, Thursday. Akala mo hawak mo ang utak ng lahat ng mga kasamahan nyo. Sa takot nilang masali sa paparating na kaso, inunahan na nila ang pagpapadala ng 10% checks dahil valid pa rin ang mga contracts ninyo.

    Alam mo sa sobrang habol nyo especially kayo ha-secret agent dahil kilala kita, mag-ipon ipon ka na nayon dahil mangangailangan ka talaga ng pera para:
    1. pamasahe mo papuntang LA dahil doon ang kaso.
    2. humanda ka ng 500$ para sa filing fee at
    7,500$ para sa lawyer's fee dahil idadagdag
    lahat yan sa sisingilin sayo.
    3. 10% na dapat mong bayaran as stated in your
    contract plus iterest and charges of
    breaching it.
    titingnan ko lang kung kanino ang huling halakhak.
    Pakisabi sa lahat ng mga kasamahan mo ha.
    Sa kagustuhan mong mairefund ang pera na pinambayad mo, tingnan lang natin sa susunod na linggo kung saan ka tatakbo! tandaan mo yan!

    ReplyDelete
  195. There you go again with all your harrassment. What is it that you want to do? It is UPI against the world now. Are you playing guessing games or trial and error here? You will never know because you have no idea what you are doing. The nerve!!!

    ReplyDelete
  196. It's not trial and error nor harrassment. try to look at your previous posted comments. Ang lagay eh pagkayo ang magpopost ng mga kahindikhindik na linya, no issue about harrassment? Pero kung mgsasalita ang kabilang grupo you charged it right away as you are being harrassed. where are your common sense and conscience? You are the one who don't kow what you are doing. I challenge you also, try to save some penny starting today dahil kakailanganin mo yan. At baka may balak kang umuwi sa pinas this summer, try to think it over first kase baka pagpinatawag ka na ng korte dahil may kasong nakasampa sayo wala ka dito, mas lalo kang lagot. Dahil kung nasa pinas ka at aatakihin ka sa sobrang takot, hindi mo na alam ang gagawin mo. Alam mo ba hindi ka makakalusot sa immigration consul ang lagay baka babalik ka na lang sa dati mong trabaho sa pinas. Yan ang dapat sa mga taong sobrang taas ang lipad. Babagsak ka rin, makikita mo!Iisaisahin kayo sa legal na paraan.

    ReplyDelete
  197. Noopeee, S.A. is not going home but will be staying in California for a month. S.A. may get to UPI to claim the money.

    ReplyDelete
  198. "Babagsak ka rin, makikita mo!Iisaisahin kayo sa legal na paraan."

    You are so lame. And clearly there is nothing in between your ears. You don't know anything but to spread empty threats. If you are serious and if you really have a case against us, why not file it in court? Why announce it here?

    Of course, we know the answer: You (Lulu Navarro and cohorts) are so desperate because the evidences against you are overwhelming. The LWC decision is just the start. Further if it will boil down to your word against our word, well who do you think is more credible -- (a) a hundred teachers, or (b) a convicted felon?

    ReplyDelete
  199. i am thrilled of upi's vengeance in the legal battle. lulu is a loose canon, as well as her director/janitor/painter " loving husband", right hand/"not a liar" (eeeeeew!) ella and cohorts.

    lulu's style is not to announce her moves. she just do her whims without much critical thinking because her moves are motivated by greed and nothing else.

    we respect everyone's rights and lulu has the right to file at any court..and what was she saying? individual attack to all those who are against her? you are right lulu! i heard that too, long time ago.

    the facts are, upi dont know where to lodge its cases for them to win. next, there is no single lawyer who can be with lulu all the way especially when lulu takes crocodile share from these lawyers...she simply changes lawyers as easy as changing her mood or lawyers leave her after contemplating that their client has nowhere to go but down. third, she doesnt know whom to sue. she doesnt even know whom to ask 10% fees from. she sent demand letters to teachers from other states, on their 3rd year even if she was not the one who facilitated their employment; she sent demand letters to the terminated teachers now in the Philippines; she sent letters to teachers who were terminated but were able to find other employment not by upi's help. and that is ridiculous!

    lulu also threatened so many teachers already charging them that they created the blog. she called teachers' parents or husband in the Philippines to give them heart attack and worries that the teacher here is not teaching but blogging. crop!

    she made teachers sign affidavits in her favor stipulating that our complaints are unfounded. offered and negotiated with sweet lies for the teachers not to pursue anything against her.

    lulu, you are so crafty!

    you want a game of intimidation? we learned the hard way from you! but we will not play your game. we speak of the truth and nothing else.

    check your minions in your own backyard lulu, make a loyalty check. even those in your family. and ella, check your "partner" too and his family. this is "save your ass" time in your flock now. but for us, if teachers are in doubt, we dont care less because we have more than enough not loyal teachers but faithful and committed ones in our side. i am very proud to be a part of this group of teachers and i am not scared of any of your empty threats and shameful wrath!

    obviously, it is upi and pars who are shaking and shivering. we know you will have your desperate moves this time. but your moves are anticipated and calculated and whatever that would be, WE ARE READY!

    one of lulu's gameplan is to pay a celebrated lawfirm---both for intimidation and hope of lowering her sanctions. it is better for her to pay a thousand dollars than to pay the $1.8M back to the teachers. she can also at anytime declare bankruptcy and give nothing to teachers.

    this is not a battle againts upi/pars/lulu/ella vs. teachers...siding with us in this battle are aft/pm/ngos/individuals/institutions/ government agencies in the Philippines and here/ top level and lower ranks in ebr/ community/ media and i should say the whole world. call me proud and stupid but i can tell you till the end..I AM NOT A LIAR! (quoting ella)

    and let me tell you this, and i'll tell this to your face when i meet you again in person here in louisiana...YOUR HAPPY DAYS ARE OVER!

    ReplyDelete
  200. aba, nasaan na na post ko kahapon about songbird na sobra ang respeto ko dahil pinanindigan niya ang lahat kahit iniwan siya ng mga ka batch niyang hunghang..??? napaghahalata tuloy na magkakakilala ang songbird at ang blog administrator.. ha ha ha.. si songbird SPED teacher... nag-iisa lang siya dun... ang mga ka batch niya na hunghang at balimbing sina ano... ano.... tanda.. medya-medya.. at ang nasa LP.. 3f lang yan ha? pero saludo ako kay songbird... di sa kanila..

    ReplyDelete

IMPORTANT. The following comments will be considered spam and will be removed: (1) not related or connected in any way to the topic and issues being discussed, and (2) excessive use of ALL CAPS. Thanks.